• If you are being asked to change your password, and unsure how to do it, follow these instructions. Click here

Accubond LR 168gr and Tikka 7mm Rem Mag

romad97

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2012
Messages
187
I am interested in whether anyone has any experience with the accubond lr 168gr bullets with a Tikka 7mm Rem Mag. When I run the numbers on Berger's twist calculator it states that it will only be marginally stable. How accurate is this calculator? I played around with some other bullets as well and most of them came up as only marginally stable. My Tikka has a 1:9.5 twist rate and I am trying to figure out the heaviest bullet I can shoot out of this rifle.
 
I did run the numbers on the Berger. It actually did say that the berger vld would be a good choice but, I have just heard so many horror stories about the lack of penetration and how bad they fragment upon impact.
 
I did run the numbers on the Berger. It actually did say that the berger vld would be a good choice but, I have just heard so many horror stories about the lack of penetration and how bad they fragment upon impact.

Every animal I've shot with them the bullets exited.

The trick to Bergers is to not shoot shoulder shots. Shoot for lung shots behind the shoulders. Softer area, no hard bones, takes out the lungs and the back of the heart, and you'll get an exit.
 
Ok thats good info. I am primarily a boiler room shooter anyway. I prefer a good heart and lung shot over a shoulder shot, it has served me well over the years. I think I am going to go ahead and give the bergers a try. If they group well I will just go with them. At the end of the day good shot placement trumps all.
 
Ok thats good info. I am primarily a boiler room shooter anyway. I prefer a good heart and lung shot over a shoulder shot, it has served me well over the years. I think I am going to go ahead and give the bergers a try. If they group well I will just go with them. At the end of the day good shot placement trumps all.

Same here. I eat what I kill, and shoulder shots ruin way too much meat. Sometimes you can't help but make a shoulder shot, but 99% of the time I make vitals shots.
 
I am actually just working on a load with the ABLR 168 with Retumbo. I have a load that will shoot .9 inch group at 100 yards. I will be working on it some more later one when I am off work but I have no issues stabilizing the bullet. I also run berger 168 & 180 gr vld out of my tikka 7mm rm both have same impact at 200 yards which is my sight in. I have taking both out too 900 yards just different drops for the 168 & 180 berger.
 
LRShooter. I would appreciate any further details about your experience with the 180 bergers in your Tikka. My real objective is to shoot the heaviest bullet I can stabilize. I hadn't even considered the 180 as the twist rate on the Tikka is so slow and the numbers on bergers calculator showed that they would be very under stabilized.
 
What would you like to know about the 180 Bergers? The place I shoot I am about 2000 ft asl was shooting at about 16 degree Celsius. I was shooting a smallish rock about 800 yards and 760 yards out and was hitting the rock no problem. My group at 450 yards with the 180s were about 2.5 inches or less. Haven't really showed any signs of it not being stable. The good thing I like about these two loads I have with bergers are that the 168 & 180 both have same zero at 200 but more drop with the 168s further out I go.
 
Sounds like I am going to definately give the 180's a try as well then. I just wrote them off as I figured I would not be able to stabilize them.
 
Yeah doesn't hurt to try them out to see if they will stabilize out of your rifle. I thought same thing when I first bought them but tried them anyways and have had good luck with them.
 
I've been shooting the 168 ABLR in my 9 twist Brux since they came out I've killed two elk with them and they have performed well...your Tikka 9.5 might be on the slow side, you will just have to try them and see..I use .640 on the BC and my drops have been spot on..
 
Warning! This thread is more than 9 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Recent Posts

Top