6.5 140 SST or A-Max

sscoyote

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2003
Messages
1,286
Location
Pueblo, CO
Going for deer/elk in about 3 weeks. 2800+ f.p.s. m.v. Shots could range to 6- or 700 yds. Any suggestions between the 2?? There's a considerable difference between the 2, and no doubt B.C. as well. Haven't looked that part up yet, but will momentarily.
 

Mysticplayer

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2001
Messages
1,459
Personally, I would go SST just incase of a close in shot. Either would work at LR but the Amax may not penetrate enough at close range.

I have been working with the 140gr SST and it is 1.5" long. BC is probably the highest in its class. Nice bullet

What cartridge are you using? Barrel length?

Jerry
 

frankg

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2001
Messages
71
Location
culpeper va
I did some testing of both bullets on my homemade tissue simulators. I am using the A-max specifically because I found it to be more explosive. I shoot groundhogs and small whitetail. I believe Hornady said they should work on foxes and small deer.
I believe the sst may be a better choice for your purposes.
 

sscoyote

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2003
Messages
1,286
Location
Pueblo, CO
I'm a backpack hunter, and as such i've been using the single shot pistols for some years now. The gun is a 16" XP in 6.5-284 Win. with 3-12X Burris Ballistic Plex reticle/target turret. I've gotten pretty good results to 700 yds. with the 129 SST, but i can add some energy with the 140 @ 6- + 700 yds. I'll be testing the rig from field positions on steel in the next few days to see what my true practical range is in the field on a deer vital area size target.My velocity estimates may be a little on the high side, but i'm figuring somewhere between 2700-2800 m.v.

[ 10-07-2003: Message edited by: sscoyote ]
 
Top