Either one is fine IF action and holes in it are straight AND bases are straight and well made. Being NF I would ASSume they will be. Anything made by man can be OFF. I check everything for straightness and that way I know its good. Many actions are OFF, as are bases and rings. The end result you want is a ring pointing straight with the bore and not binding the scope tube. It doesn't really matter how you get there. There are rings available to make up for the lack of action trueness if that will tell you anything.I see nightforce makes a 2 piece 20moa base which is what I'd like, but I am wondering if the 1 piece is better for accuracy around 700 to 1000 yards, or will the 2piece be fine?
I see nightforce makes a 2 piece 20moa base which is what I'd like, but I am wondering if the 1 piece is better for accuracy around 700 to 1000 yards, or will the 2piece be fine?
Not to mention adding strength to your action. Not a big consideration with light calibers but as we move up the magnum ladder that becomes more and more of a consideration.I prefer the 1 piece as it gives me more flexibility.
Oh man that hurts even to look at!Here's a solution; I guess the craftsperson couldn't find the correct setup.
I prefer the 1 piece as it gives me more flexibility.
I prefer the 1 piece as it gives me more flexibility.
Can you explain this?
With 2-piece you are stuck to where ever the slot happens to fall. With 1-piece, because of multiple slots, it gives you the flexibility for best eye relief while providing even pressure on the scope's main tube. I like "mine" centered as I possibly can ... but that's just "my" personal preference. Hopefully, the example pix below illustrates what I am talking about and answers your query ...
Sorry, I misunderstood the OP's original question. I was thinking 1pc vs 2 pc mounts not bases and I couldn't figure out how a 1pc mount gives more flexibility. I agree that 1 pc base is the way to go.