Bubble level?

wilkup

wilkup

Well-Known Member
Bronze Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2013
Messages
2,761
Reaction score
3,639
City & State/Province
Cle Elum, WA
I'm curious if anyone on here uses a rail level rather than integral like the Hawken LW TAC (whether offset or on top, front or rear ring mount) or clamp on scope tube style.
I'm considering picking one up just to see if I like that setup more than the other two I've tried. Seems like there's only advantages for me and would be curious if anyone has some downside to share.
Thanks in advance m.
 
I tried a rail mounted bubble level for a bit. I didn't like the way it protruded from the action and the sight picture when I checked level. I moved to a scope mounted bubble. I have a couple Flatline Ops bubbles but the cheap ones from Amazon have held up just fine as well.
 
I run both. Neither I can find disadvantages besides rail mount needs rail space. I've heard of the scope mounted ones can come loose but I've not had that happen. I've got a couple with the level made into the scope rings/ mount that also work well. About all of the ones I use are Flatline. They are solid and leave adjustment to find tune the level, but you have to remember to flip them out when needed.
 
if you can get one integrated into your rings either at the top or bottom
those are great
I have a few that mount off to the side and they always catch on cases and backpacks
 
I've had good luck with this level. I think it's made by Monstrum and ran like $15 on Amazon.

IMG_0102.jpeg
 
I switched from a rail mounted level to an offset scope mount. The rail mount one took my focus away from the target when leveling and the offset scope mount allows me to see both the target in the crosshairs and level at same time
 
Like others have said. Their benefit comes more into play at long range. I had one for a while on a scope and now I can't remember. I now try to have the least amount of gizmos on my rifle.
I can agree with using them in training for shooting at the range. For me, It helped develop consistency at holding scope consistently upright. So in that way I think it is very helpful in developing good habits.
 
I prefer an adjustable system. A ring-mounted level is easier to fine-tune, and I also like models that clamp directly onto the scope tube. When moving the scope from one rifle to another, the level remains aligned with that scope's reticle.
 
memtb said:
On the subject of levels…..is there a significant benefit to having/using one if one's shots on game will "never" exceed 600 yards!

If so….I wonder what % of long range (OK medium range) hunters use a level! memtb
Click to expand...
For some reason I have a serious cant problem, the level definitely helps me keep things square. I am not sure how much difference it makes out to 400, but I definitely start seeing drift at 5 and 6 if I don't watch my level. Some guys can just look at something and see level, I do not have that gift.
 
Rail and scope mounted spirit (bubble) levels have been great for me and my #1 addition to any rifle for anyone shooting accurate at distance.

That said, due to vision issues, I went with a MDT LRA and SG Pulse light levels, I prefer the SG Pulse.
 

Similar threads

H
Best bubble level?
3 4 5
Replies
59
Views
5K
Taylorbok
T
General RE LEE
Scope Bubble Level Location
2
Replies
16
Views
16K
General RE LEE
General RE LEE
LanceS4803
SWFA bubble level install?
Replies
8
Views
2K
LanceS4803
LanceS4803
E
Bubble level on scope.
Replies
2
Views
1K
engineer40
E
B
Scope bubble level clarity
Replies
6
Views
1K
Deleted member 46119
D

Recent Posts

Back
Top