Looking for a new hunting bullet... Which one!??!

I've had problems with the 190 ABLR's in my 300 wsm as well, even with appropriate shots.
Also had problems with the 168 ABLR's in my 308's.
Sad because now I have several boxes of very expensive bullets.
I'm going back to my old faithful 165 grain Speer btsp for my 308 and am going to try the 180 grain version in the wsm.
Might try the 180 grain scirocco.
Pm me if you're looking to get rid of those 190 and 168 ABLR.
 
I recovered on this year, 190 grain ABLR going 2850 at the muzzle. Shot was 360 yards and hit high through the lungs.
Recovery weight was 75.3 grains.
That does not seem acceptable for 360 yards.
Never lost and animal with the old Speer btsp.
Have lost elk and deer with the 190's in my wsm and 168's in my 308's.
I do get good accuracy and long range ballistics out of the ABLR's but not good terminal performance.
Sounds like it worked wonderful..what did you see you didn't like? At close ranges like that, the ABLR is going to come apart and thats just fine.
 
I shoot 168 A-max out of my 300 wsm going around 3150. I haven't shot an elk but several deer and pigs with great success.
 
So I have a 300 WSM I love but last few animals I have shot I am not seeing the results I want on animals and I actually lost a buck in Colorado this weekend. So I am looking to try and switch things up. Currently shooting the 190 ABLR. Recently scored some 200 grain ELDX before this all happened just to try them out. I just hear good and bad about every kind of bullet so looking for some insight. A buddy of mine says for smaller game like deer or antelope I need a softer bullet or possibly the speed of the gun and bullets are too much. I forgot to add... Seams like the closer the shot the less I see great results but the further shots seam to do better. 200 yards and in are not great but 300 out seam much better and my AR10 stones most things so I am trying to figure out how to solve the situation. Thoughts??
I have a 300 WSM with 22" barrel and I love it. I tried several bullets before obtaining excellent accuracy pushing a 180 grain scirocco at 2880 FPS with 66 grains of super performance powder. It has performed flawlessly at close and longer range. My daughter killed a black bear out of a tree (hound hunting) at 25 yards. The bullet was found on the far hide with 70% weight retention, even after encountering bone. My son killed a deer at 600 yards. First bullet hit the hind quarter (missing bone) of the broadside deer due to my undercalling the wind and a second bullet hit the crease after a quick correction. Both bullets hit like hammers and both bullets exited. He also killed a bull elk this year at 250 yards. One shot kill. The gun/bullet combo shoots 1/2 MOA accuracy at 100 yards and sub 1/2 MOA at 500 yards. This is the most confident I have been in any bullet for a long time. Frangible bullets like bergers tend to do well at long range but less stellar at short range, especially if you hit heavy bone. The scirocco for me has been the best balance of energy transfer, weight retention, and accuracy that I have been looking for in a bullet for both close and far encounters.

The BC of 0.52 worried me at first, but at 6000 feet elevation the bullet is still going about 1950 FPS at 800 yards, which is beyond my 600-700 yard self imposed max distance for hunting. So unless you really need the bullet to perform beyond 800-900 yards I can confidently say that this is the bullet you are looking for.

I also had good performance out of factory 200 grain ELD-X but that was a bear at 525 yards and the bullet impacted spine and obliterated it. Not the best overall measure of performance but I was happy with what I saw. I would not be afraid to shoot that bullet if I couldn't find the 180 scirocco or if I couldn't get the scirocco to tune properly.
 
The plain-jane Accubond bullet should fill the bill. Very easy to find an accurate load for IME. Stout enough to withstand close range shots and soft enough to expand at 400-500yds. I've shot many whitetails with the 160 Accubond with good results at your stated outer limit.

Just my 2 cents
Very well put, they are wicked!
 
I have shot up to 450 -500 dont plan on shooting further.
I have had good results with hammer bullets. I have only shot one bull, was 400 yds with a 30-06, and it put him right down, would thing the 300 wsm would give some good velocities. They are the easiest bullet to load for that I have used. But there are lots of good options, 300 wsm is a good cartridge.
 
The plain-jane Accubond bullet should fill the bill. Very easy to find an accurate load for IME. Stout enough to withstand close range shots and soft enough to expand at 400-500yds. I've shot many whitetails with the 160 Accubond with good results at your stated outer limit.

Just my 2 cents
Very well said, they are wicked!
 
Sounds like it worked wonderful..what did you see you didn't like? At close ranges like that, the ABLR is going to come apart and thats just fine.
I think I was expecting a bigger mushroom and better penetration like I have seen with other bullets. It seemed like a lot of the damage was superficial and it was not a clean kill. I will admit the shot was a little high, about 8" below the spine, but it didn't have the effect on the elk I would have liked.
 
Regarding the accubond long range I have seen many people unhappy with them and I have personally seen them underperform when striking heavy bone. I think the ELD-X will have a better balance at short and long range, but if you really are limiting shots to under 600 yards, I would strongly consider the Scirocco, A-frame, or nosler partition. You will get the front half expansion and the weight retention for getting through tough bone at close or longer range. You would probably also get fantastic results with the lighter weight hammer hunters. They don't have the BC for beyond 600 yards but you can push them so fast out of the WSM that out to 500 you should have excellent results. With the hammers you want a high impact velocity. Consider even the 124 grain bullets and do not go above 169 as the longer bullets will consume too much case capacity.
 
I think I was expecting a bigger mushroom and better penetration like I have seen with other bullets. It seemed like a lot of the damage was superficial and it was not a clean kill. I will admit the shot was a little high, about 8" below the spine, but it didn't have the effect on the elk I would have liked.
8 inches below the spine in the chest cavity is not too high. That is a good shot. Anything in the lungs below the spine with a rifle is a great shot.
 

Recent Posts

Top