Barrels 2020

I have 2 X-caliber barrels. One was a Savage prefit o bought when the company was brand new and the other an AR-15 barrel in 6.5 Creedmoor I bought more recently. Fit and finish on both are amazing and both shoot consistent 1/2 moa with Hornady factory ammo. Hard to beat that. I even hit the milk jug at 1 mile with the savage in 6.5 Creedmoor
 
I have been thinking about this for awhile and I want to make a thread discussing barrels and their quality as of now. Barrels like all things go up and down and change over the years. I know of a few barrel manufactures who have stepped their game up in the last couple years and seem to be producing better results. I currently am running Bartlein barrels and have no complaints about them. I however am very curious and I always like to experiment and learn more.

Having said that, if any of you could just give me a brief review or opinion on recent barrels you have used/installed/inspected I would really appreciate it. This is not a bashing thread, but I want it to be sort of a guide and understanding of where barrels stand as of 2020. I'll start off and say from my experiences , I see mainly Bartlein, Brux, Krieger, and Proof barrels. Those all seem to do well, but how about all the other guys?
I have tried most of the barrel makers mentioned. My last two have been Hawk hill. I have found them to be the best of the best. I have visited the facility more than a couple of times, and I can tell you the owner is on the machines. He takes pride in making shure that every barrel is absolutely perfect.
 
The problem is they're not consistent and they aren't hand lapped, I've had a few McGowans myself, all copper fouled bad and only one shot really consistent.
You can definitely get one that shoots bug holes but its a gamble

I had two Preferred Barrels and they were a nightmare to say the least.
Here's a pile of patches after 20 shots that came out of a barrel that has a mcgowan blank, this was post break in.
The two Preferred Barrels I had did the exact same thing, all three barrels shot poorly.
View attachment 230652
That's a bummer to say the least. Is that a Carbon Fiber wrapped McGowen? How long ago did you have the Preferred Barrels?
 
Last edited:
The problem is they're not consistent and they aren't hand lapped, I've had a few McGowans myself, all copper fouled bad and only one shot really consistent.
You can definitely get one that shoots bug holes but its a gamble

I had two Preferred Barrels and they were a nightmare to say the least.
Here's a pile of patches after 20 shots that came out of a barrel that has a mcgowan blank, this was post break in.
The two Preferred Barrels I had did the exact same thing, all three barrels shot poorly.
View attachment 230652
Could you elaborate on the issues with Preferred? I am in the market for a prefit to save wear on my hunting barrel and not a lot of companies offer lighter contours in in the sub-$400 area. I'm not looking for benchrest, just something around MOA to bang steel with and practice at distance. I'm currently looking at a wilson from Ragged Holes, Preferred, or one of the lighter contours from X-caliber. Xcaliber worries me that they specifically exclude their lighter contours from their accuracy guarantee. I'd buy a criterion but I'd have to sand my stock open even more to fit it.

It seems every time I read a stack of positive reviews I find a few really negative ones and I go back to the drawing board. All of the feedback in this thread has been very helpful.

To add to the thread:

I have a criterion target barrel from NSS in 6.5 creedmoor that shoots very well and does not walk with heat.

I have a rock creek #2 from PVA that shoots way too good for how light it is and has been very very easy to load for. Easily a 1/2 minute barrel in 6.5 PRC. Cleaning is a breeze as well and the barrel runs relatively fast.

I had a bartlein in the past that was excellent was well.
 
The problem is they're not consistent and they aren't hand lapped, I've had a few McGowans myself, all copper fouled bad and only one shot really consistent.
You can definitely get one that shoots bug holes but its a gamble

I had two Preferred Barrels and they were a nightmare to say the least.
Here's a pile of patches after 20 shots that came out of a barrel that has a mcgowan blank, this was post break in.
The two Preferred Barrels I had did the exact same thing, all three barrels shot poorly.
View attachment 230652


Like the old song. blue on blue; heartache on heartache.
 
I have two Lilja barrels both in 3G (30" 1:8" .27 cal and 27" 1:9" in .30 cal), and I am very pleased with them. Shoots accurately and hardly fouls.
Sir Feenix wrote he's using a 1:8 .27 caliber barrel, which piqued my curiosity.

I'm a big .270 Winchester fan. Unfortunately, because factory barrels have universally been twisted 1:10, this grand old cartridge has not been able to take advantage of the new long-for-caliber, higher-BC projectiles which other calibers have adapted to so well. Some new bullets are coming available now in .277 from Berger and Nosler. I hope Sierra follows suit with their Game Changer.

I have an old Rem. 700 (inherited from my Grandfather) chambered in .270 which I'd like to re-build and re-barrel. I'll look into Lilja on Feenix' recommendation. I've used X-Caliber and Brux custom barrels on projects so far and have been really pleased with them.

I was considering a light contour 20" or 22" as I'd like to build a backpacking rifle with a lightweight folding chassis stock. I carried a fat Muley Buck out of a steep canyon this year (two heavy trips!) and it's very nice to fold and stow your rifle inside your pack for such an endeavor.

I've been wondering if I should go with 1:8 or 1:8.5. I spoke with Sierra a few weeks ago and Phil on the tech support line assured me their old standby 150 BTSP Game King will hold up fine while inside the tube with a 1:8 twist . . . but he wondered if it might open up more quickly on impact with meat if spinning faster than 1:10. He didn't have any evidence to suggest it, but thought it could happen. The 150 Sierra isn't a "long range" bullet but I've sure had great luck with it. I wonder if a faster spin rate affects other, higher-BC bullets on impact too?

Has anyone had any experiences with bullets being more fragile than usual on game when shot through a tight twist barrel?

If Feenix, or anyone else, finds time to reply, I'd sure like to know what bullets and handloads you've been using in your 1:8 twist .270 Winchester barrels.

Thank you in advance for your assistance.

SF -
Brad Norman
Nevada
 

Attachments

  • 20201020_094639.jpg
    20201020_094639.jpg
    2.6 MB · Views: 98
Last edited:
I purchased a Shilen Savage pre-fit hat was manufactured in July 2019 and its fantastic. No complaints whatsoever. That's my only recent barrel purchase.

I also like that they still offer blued barrels. They look as good as they shoot in my experience.
 
Last edited:
I wanted to comment on Preferred barrels. They do not lap their barrels and when I emailed them when they first started up they were adamant about their barrels not needing to be lapped. Again this isn't about bashing brands, but in today's world I think lapping is a must for a quality barrel. If I was looking for a prefit it would be either a criterion or one of the options from straight jacket.
 
I have been thinking about this for awhile and I want to make a thread discussing barrels and their quality as of now. Barrels like all things go up and down and change over the years. I know of a few barrel manufactures who have stepped their game up in the last couple years and seem to be producing better results. I currently am running Bartlein barrels and have no complaints about them. I however am very curious and I always like to experiment and learn more.

Having said that, if any of you could just give me a brief review or opinion on recent barrels you have used/installed/inspected I would really appreciate it. This is not a bashing thread, but I want it to be sort of a guide and understanding of where barrels stand as of 2020. I'll start off and say from my experiences , I see mainly Bartlein, Brux, Krieger, and Proof barrels. Those all seem to do well, but how about all the other guys?
I've bought 11 Barrels in the past year and a half. My go-To is Bartlien I have never had an issue with them or the quality of their work, excellent, long lasting sub MOA barrels. I have recently purchase two PROOF barrels for a couple of light weight hunting builds 300 PRC on a Masterpiece Arms chassis with Kahles 525i scope long range hunting 27" custom sendero barrel. Not done yet but will update!
 
Jud, I envy you working for John Pierce. Jim Nordhof was extremely helpful in my FT-R rifle 2 years ago. I sent in a Bartlein Palma barrel, and we used a McMillan stock which has been a fabulous weapon. working on getting my sight back from retina detachments last year so I can hopefully start competitions. I have three Bartlein builds, two Kreiger builds, and two Rock River; all shoot extremely well. Best to you.
Thank you. Working at Pierce is a dream job of mine and I love what I do. I make parts for the custom actions we make. I however get to see all the rifles, barrels, scopes, actions, etc that come through the shop so it's really great for me.
 
Sir Feenix wrote he's using a 1:8 .27 caliber barrel, which piqued my curiosity.

I'm a big .270 Winchester fan. Unfortunately, because factory barrels have universally been twisted 1:10, this grand old cartridge has not been able to take advantage of the new long-for-caliber, higher-BC projectiles which other calibers have adapted to so well. Some new bullets are coming available now in .277 from Berger and Nosler. I hope Sierra follows suit with their Game Changer.

I have an old Rem. 700 (inherited from my Grandfather) chambered in .270 which I'd like to re-build and re-barrel. I'll look into Lilja on Feenix' recommendation. I've used X-Caliber and Brux custom barrels on projects so far and have been really pleased with them.

I was considering a light contour 20" or 22" as I'd like to build a backpacking rifle with a lightweight folding chassis stock. I carried a fat Muley Buck out of a steep canyon this year (two heavy trips!) and it's very nice to fold and stow your rifle inside your pack for such an endeavor.

I've been wondering if I should go with 1:8 or 1:8.5. I spoke with Sierra a few weeks ago and Phil on the tech support line assured me their old standby 150 BTSP Game King will hold up fine while inside the tube with a 1:8 twist . . . but he wondered if it might open up more quickly on impact with meat if spinning faster than 1:10. He didn't have any evidence to suggest it, but thought it could happen. The 150 Sierra isn't a "long range" bullet but I've sure had great luck with it. I wonder if a faster spin rate affects other, higher-BC bullets on impact too?

Has anyone had any experiences with bullets being more fragile than usual on game when shot through a tight twist barrel?

If Feenix, or anyone else, finds time to reply, I'd sure like to know what bullets and handloads you've been using in your 1:8 twist .270 Winchester barrels.

Thank you in advance for your assistance.

SF -
Brad Norman
Nevada
Brad,

My .270 AI was built primarily to propel the 165/175 Matrix VLD. Unfortunately, I have only loaded the 175. My current accuracy load (.75 MOA @ 966 yards if I do my part) is 58 H4831SC (as always, work up to it slowly and watch for pressure signs) at 2993 FPS. I reach near 3100 FPS, but it showed a sign of pressure, and the group opened up. Others are claiming an additional 100 FPS with RL-26.

I think Phil is correct; the 150 should hold up with the 1:8". I have some 150 LRABs but have not tried them yet.

.270 AI atop the mountain.jpg

2 of 2 coyote.jpg

Taken at 525 with 175 Matrix.

WT Doe 1 of 2.jpg


Heart shot at 200 yards, almost field dressed. :)
 
Warning! This thread is more than 4 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.
Top