Shorter barrel on 26 Nosler or 6.5 SAUM 4s?

SouthTXBowhunter

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2008
Messages
116
Location
Sabinal, TX
I'm interested in building a compact and lightweight hunting rifle in 6.5mm that'll push 140s fast. It'll be suppressed and I'd like to use a 22" bbl or, at longest, a 24" bbl. I'm interested in the 26 Nosler and the 6.5 SAUM 4s but I can't find any info on the effect (especially on the 26 Nosler) about cutting the barrel shorter. I realize that I'll loose some velocity but I'm wondering how much and whether there are any other pitfalls to going a little shorter than typical lengths, with these 2 calibers? Has anyone gone shorter with either of these calibers?
 
Everyone has different ideas about things but for me, if you're wanting a short barreled somewhat light weight rifle in a 6.5, the SAUM or WSM are, in my opinion, a better option. In a barrel that short you're only going to give up about 100fps to the MUCH larger case capacity of the 26 Nosler. A 6.5 SAUM or 6.5 WSM will get you within 100fps but it'll do it in a short action, which will help cut weight, and will do it with 20+grains less powder.

There's no doubt about it, the 26 Nosler and 6.5-300Wby in none wildcat cartridges are pretty much the speed kings but they're doing it by burning 85+ grains of powder and with that kind of case capacity in a 22-24 inch tube, it'd be like driving a NHRA Pro Stock as your daily driver.
 
Everyone has different ideas about things but for me, if you're wanting a short barreled somewhat light weight rifle in a 6.5, the SAUM or WSM are, in my opinion, a better option. In a barrel that short you're only going to give up about 100fps to the MUCH larger case capacity of the 26 Nosler. A 6.5 SAUM or 6.5 WSM will get you within 100fps but it'll do it in a short action, which will help cut weight, and will do it with 20+grains less powder.

There's no doubt about it, the 26 Nosler and 6.5-300Wby in none wildcat cartridges are pretty much the speed kings but they're doing it by burning 85+ grains of powder and with that kind of case capacity in a 22-24 inch tube, it'd be like driving a NHRA Pro Stock as your daily driver.

Those 2 extra inches (26" bbl) really make that much difference in the 26 Nosler? Interesting. I wouldn't have thought it made that much difference but that's exactly why I asked.
 
Those 2 extra inches (26" bbl) really make that much difference in the 26 Nosler? Interesting. I wouldn't have thought it made that much difference but that's exactly why I asked.
It does due to the case capacity.

Also, with the Nosler barrel life will probably be less than half what you'd expect from the 6.5 Saum.

If I were you I'd give firm consideration to the .264wm.
 
Id figure 25fps per inch for either. I don't think the 26 will lose much more than the 4s as a short barrel. however much faster the 26 is at 26" will be pretty close to how much faster it would be if they were both 22".

Read a post by Charlie Sisk years ago where he did an experiment cutting barrels down from long to short and measuring velocity for a bunch of different calibers. They all lost about 20 or 25 fps per inch regardless if they were a "magnum" or not. All of the powder is basically burned waaaay before the bullet reaches the end of the barrel.

I'd build for balance/weight.
 
There's lots of powder to be burnt with the 26 nosler, 26 to 28" tubes and a proper chamber for the largest pills is about the only place the 26 starts to make sense and shine. The 6.5 GAP will be a MUCH better choice for a shorter barrel. Personally I would not go shorter than 24" with 25" being better, still a good bit of powder that needs to be burn to maximize this particular cambering. Throat it for 143 eldx's and make it 24-25" and you will have a nice rig with better barrel life than the 26 Nosler. I'd be willing to bet that the 26 Nosler would be lucky to have a 100 fps advantage if both were loaded with appropriate propellants and 140 grain bullets.
 
For a 26 Nosler to really start to shine Berger or Hornaday need to come out with a 155 to 160 grain bullet with out getting the bearing surface out of wack and have a Hybrid design. Ream a custom chamber for such a bullet (Think 28 Nosler and the 195 Berger) Even then thats a lot of piston to get moving with not a whole lot of *** end to get things moving. Think healthy dose of RE33 and a 28" tube with a BC of .7+ Now the 26 Nosler will be alive!
 
Honestly with a 22" uhhhhhh wouldn't a hmmmm uhhhh just about any SA cartridge be more logical? I know I know I'm rarely logical either but you are talking about a very small difference between a tiny 6.5 Creed versus either of those. The BC is the magic in the 6.5 arena, not the velocity anyway.
22" is short for a SAUM much less a Nosler. Between the two SAUM all day long. Otherwise spin on a Creed or 260 and be within a hair of the other two.
 
Honestly with a 22" uhhhhhh wouldn't a hmmmm uhhhh just about any SA cartridge be more logical? I know I know I'm rarely logical either but you are talking about a very small difference between a tiny 6.5 Creed versus either of those. The BC is the magic in the 6.5 arena, not the velocity anyway.
22" is short for a SAUM much less a Nosler. Between the two SAUM all day long. Otherwise spin on a Creed or 260 and be within a hair of the other two.


Not sure what your idea of within a hair is but I have a creed , a 6.5 saum and a 260 rem . I promise you the saum is much faster than creed and a good 200 fps faster than the 260 in the rifles I own . All wear 24 inch barrels and all shooting Thier best about a grain and a half off of first pressure sign . Definitely go with the saum if you handling. If shooting factory I would go 260 for hunting which you mentioned. Only advantage to the creed is cheaper ammo if you don't handload.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 4 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.
Top