CoupleKimbers
Active Member
Is your 270 wsm a Montana as well?
This is self contradictory and makes no sense. The whole point of the pillars is go give you solid contact between the stock and pillars so you get proper torque each time eliminating any stresses on the action from being torqued into the stock.Marine Tex Gray. Do not buy the white. Yes, you want to expose the pillars so there is no metal to metal contact. Bed the lug tightly. The bedding process is neutral, similar to the bedding on a NULA except the bedding only extends to the end of the barrel's full cylinder diameter. 99% of the rifles I own retain the same POI year after year, even the wood stocked ones.
A buddy of mine has a 7mmRem Mag that he asked me to bed into a McMillan stock. Rifle shot beautifully after bedding. The stock was an older model which he wasn't really fond of. He sold it and bought a much trimmer McMillan with the edge fill. The exact models escape me at the moment. In any event, I again bedded the rifle in the new stock. It shot within 1/2" of the POI in the old stock. True story. If you don't believe me I can provide his phone number so you can text him.
I don't know of any BR guys that are "gluing" their stocks to the action but if they are they don't need pillars or screws at all since they'll be permanently bonded until the stock is chiseled or cut off from the action.Pillars were not designed for bedding. The were designed to stop wood and the newly designed synthetics from being "crushed" when torque was applied to the action screws. It only takes about 15in/lbs of torque to stress an action. Now just think about a pillar not being perfectly even nor have 100% contact with the tang and receiver. Ask a benchrest shooter why they glue stocks in without pillars. BTW, I'm talking about bedding 8lb or less hunting rifles. Rifles that have 1" diameter to the muzzle I do not shoot nor own.
If I remember correctly it was Kelly McMillan that introduced pillar bedding back in the mid to early 80's. You can google it to find the info.
Another no-no is to have action screws touching the pillars. The reasoning behind that is the same reasoning behind not having metal to metal contact between the receiver and the pillars.
IF you don't have metal to metal contact between the stock and pillars and then between the head of the screws and the pillar or bottom metal and pillar you're introducing more variables and inconsistency because you're still leaving some room for "crush."Take your rifle apart, put it back together. Same torque, etc. Does it shoot to the same place? Groups change? Overly sensitive to torque values/amounts? Fliers? Of the mind you don't dare change anything for fear the rifle ju-ju might be lost? Ever shoot one of your rigs with only the front action screw tightened to your preferred torque value? I have and not so unsurprisingly the rifle shot within the previous groups but were just a bit larger. The omission of the rear screw was unintentional but it proved to me the method works.
It's worked for me and every other rifle I've bedded for friends and acquaintances.
BTW, ever hear of the Kimber roulette? The steps I take eliminate it along with a couple of other minor items such as overly long base screws, magazine depth being incorrect,etc. I have bedded floorplates and magazine boxes but doing so never seemed to make a difference in group size, repeatability, etc.
You'll never agree with my method and that's OK. I'm simply eliminating variables on hunting rifles which in the end is what this is all about.
I'll post pics of group sizes, take the rifle apart with pics, put it back together and shoot again (with this 280AI), post pics etc and we'll see if I'm anywhere close to being right.
If that is the case why bother with pillars at all?No "crush" with 45-50 in/lbs of torque,
To keep from crushing wood fibers, cracking stocks, etc.If that is the case why bother with pillars at all?