Jim in Cali
Well-Known Member
Weatherby finally brought back the 6.5-300 it will be on their menu Oct. 1st 2015 they promise 100fps + faster then the Nosler. Did not mention bullet weights though.
Weatherby finally brought back the 6.5-300 it will be on their menu Oct. 1st 2015 they promise 100fps + faster then the Nosler. Did not mention bullet weights though.
Shame they couldn't make the .264 Weatherby (based off the .257/.270/7mm Weatherby case).
I bet with the current 6.5 craze, they could make a killing. And it would be a much more efficient design, and wouldn't be as bad of a barrel burner, IMO.
I can empathize if you feel frustrated because what you had built did not meet your needs. It would help us understand more if you explained why it did not meet your expectations.The free bore in Weatherby is a real problem. My 240 I just had built will be my last Weatherby. You can find better cartridges & better brass.
Thanks, Kirk
The long Weatherby neck should put it right with the 26 Nosler. Some believe including me the the long case neck takes the brunt of the heat, and not the throat.Boy that seems to be lot of powder to be burnt in a .264 bore, even with the super slow powders available today. I was wondering what kind of barrel life your expecting from this cartridge. Would it be worth that shortened barrel life for an extra 100-200 fps ??
Weatherby said it's not about barrel life. If that is a worry, seek elsewhere for your jollies.Boy that seems to be lot of powder to be burnt in a .264 bore, even with the super slow powders available today. I was wondering what kind of barrel life your expecting from this cartridge. Would it be worth that shortened barrel life for an extra 100-200 fps ??
Boy that seems to be lot of powder to be burnt in a .264 bore, even with the super slow powders available today. I was wondering what kind of barrel life your expecting from this cartridge. Would it be worth that shortened barrel life for an extra 100-200 fps ??