Trigger question
- Thread starter soewe812
- Start date
Help Support Long Range Hunting Forum
188MULE
Well-Known Member
One more for Geissele.
Was going to ask this in a new thread but seems this is the place to ask it. Have any of you had troubles with your hammers on the timney or giesselle hitting the front part of your dpms lr308 lowers?
Was going to ask this in a new thread but seems this is the place to ask it. Have any of you had troubles with your hammers on the timney or giesselle hitting the front part of your dpms lr308 lowers?
With or without the upper installed? The Geisselle hammer will hit the lower if the upper is not installed. Geisselle mentions that in the installation video on YouTube. Haven't had any problems with the hammer hitting anything it's not supposed to hit when the upper is installed.
jasonprox700
Well-Known Member
Nope. I run the SSA in my .308 and don't have a problem. I'll be switching to a SSA-E in the future.
Gus McCrae
Well-Known Member
Another vote for the Geissele. I've got the SSA in my DPMS 556 and love it.
I bought a new Colt LE6920-M4 last week and today I picked up a Giessele SSA-E which I will install by this weekend. Mine is pictured bellow.
My buddy has a 6720 with the SSA-E in it. This is a 3 shot target he shot with his. When the barrel heats up the groups get larger too.
joseph
My buddy has a 6720 with the SSA-E in it. This is a 3 shot target he shot with his. When the barrel heats up the groups get larger too.
joseph
Attachments
188MULE
Well-Known Member
I have some kind of error in the lower, the timney would not work, it would bind on the front of lower trigger housing (not milspec) which would bind up my bolt causing it to malfunction. The problem with the gieselle is it has a small raised portion on the front of the hammer which would contact causing light primer strikes. I remedied this by fileing this portion down until it did not hit. It now works great and is a 1/2 minute rifle.
