Mil Dot system

SRT131

Member
Joined
May 16, 2004
Messages
7
Location
SE US
Can you only accurately determine range at a specified power setting when you are using a variable power scope with a mil dot reticule or does the power setting come into play at all?

Can anyone share with me their opinion on the Leupold Duplex Ranging retcule? (For game not longrange target)
 

chris matthews

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 14, 2001
Messages
838
Location
Urich, MO
Yes, the power definitely comes into play. Most of the Loopies and the NF have to be at a certain power setting for the reticle to subtend 3.6" (one milliradian) at 100 yards.
Duplex is to coarse to properly range with, for that matter so is the mil dot.
That's why they make lasers!
 

Pete Lincoln

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 17, 2004
Messages
658
Location
Germany
get a Schmidt & Bender, then it doesn't matter what power setti8ng you are on, you can still range with the reticle.
Pete
 

BountyHunter

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2007
Messages
5,343
Location
Wilmington NC
Premier Reticles can also install a first focal plane mil dot reticle in any leupold where power does not matter. Had one for about 14 yrs.

BH
 

Dave King

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 3, 2001
Messages
2,366
As both Chris and Pete stated the MilDot system works and does not work, I'll try to expand on the info.


The MiDot system must be calibrated to subtend 3.6" (U.S. measure) at 100 yards to be used as designed. Many variable power scopes must be set to a predetermined power setting to get the correct Mil value, some scopes have the reticle in the proper plane so as to adjust the apparent size of the reticle as the power is changed and these scopes are calibrated to one (1) Mil no matter the power setting (Pete refers to these types).

There is an "art" to using a MilDot reticle, it takes practice to use it accurately. The operator must be able to judge portions of a Mil to get a good/accurate reading. The second part of the Mil ranging system, the part we can't well control in a non-target environment, is the target size. To accurately determine a target's distance the operator MUST know the target size and then judge the Mil reading and determine the range. Having only an approximate size for the target (critter) makes an accurate reading a little difficult and would probably shorten the distances the reticle can be used for accurate (realistic) readings.

Perhaps this helps a bit and maybe you can now better understand why ranging with a MilDot reticle is both accurate and inaccurate. It's a great tool and I have them on all the rifle scopes I hunt big game with but I also know that there are limitations.... AND I carry a laser.
 

SRT131

Member
Joined
May 16, 2004
Messages
7
Location
SE US
Thank you for the responses to my question.

I looked for a fixed 10 power leupold with mildot, but it is out of my price range right now. I found a Leupold VXII 3-9x40 tactical with mildot for around $334 and a similar Sightron scope with mildot for a little more. I am leaning toward the Leupold but have heard good things about the Sightron. Your opinions?
 

Pete Lincoln

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 17, 2004
Messages
658
Location
Germany
Thats right Dave (say hi to your son for me by the way), now the mildot system was developed for ranging military applications and it works very well for that application, if you slightly inaccurately range an enemy soldier, the likely hood is you will still hit with an incapacitation shot, afterall if you hit anwhere from groin to head you are going to do dammage enough to eliminate the enemy from battle, you have almost a meter of target area in which to drop a bullet verticaly, that means if you misjudge the range by a few meters you will still hit, getting the dope on the wind is far more important than ranging to the exact meter for military applications, as the enemy provides a target that is approx 1m from groin to top of head, but only perhaps 40cm wide, hence misjudging the wind will lead you to more misses than will been a bit of with your mildot subtentions and estimations, now when you cone to range deer or pigs we definately have to hit within a smaller kill zone, the vitals on a game animal are not alll that big, and we want to kill that animal with the minimum of suffering, ie. none at all, so we must estimate range and wind as accurately as possible. The only way to become effective at this is to practice practice practice. If you use a lazer rangefinder often, try to estimate the range by guessing, then by using the mildot reticle and then verify with the lazer, you will then be constantly practicing and testing, thus increasing you ranging ability. Then when its foggy or the battery packs in, you will still be effective. With practice it is possible to become very proficient with a mildot reticle.
I prefer the scopes (like the S&B and most European scopes) that let you range with the reticle on any power setting, also by far the best policy is to forget about feet inches and yards altogether. work in Meters and centimeters, its all ones and tens, far easier to calculate than fractions of an inch or of an MOA. stick with mils, 1 mil(miliradian) = 1m @1000m, the S&B PMII's i have adjust in clicks or 1/10 miliradian @100m (ie. 1cm) it is just so simple to use this, no division by 36, no fractions, all easy easy to do. why the hell the US military range in miliradians using the mildot scope, then convert into feet inches and yards, adjust the scope in fractions of an inch, and measure distance in meters and Km is beyond me, if we stick to 1's and 10's its so much easier..
Pete
 

4ked Horn

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2007
Messages
1,521
Bounty hunter. Tell me more about your reticle. Do you love it? Do you experience any drawbacks to this first focal plane thing?

Why do you suppose this is not done on all mildot reticles?

I'm on my way to thier website to read up on this. I know what I want for my birthday.
 

huntin1

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2003
Messages
80
Location
Jamestown, North Dakota
SRT131,

I have both a VX II 3x9x40 tactical and a Sightron 4x16x42MD. Both are good scopes for the money. I like the Sightron a little better, it seems to be a little crisper and it goes to 16X it also has an adjustable objective. I used to be strictly a Leupold man, but in this price range I think the Sightron has em beat.

huntin1
 

Trending threads

Nightforce has great tracking capabilities, they are rugged, a bunch of elevation, holds zero forever, and reticles are designed for long range shooting. So if you are looking to shoot long distances constantly, then you need a scope that can take the abuse. -- gilmillan1


Culture Of Excellence At Nightforce Optics
By Len Backus

A high level of quality both in production and in service. Read More


Nightforce is such a solid combo of reticle, available elevation, glass that is good enough to shoot at the longest range you can dial. Nightforce has bullet proof construction that can handle the incidental horse rolling or some other rodeo action. -- bigngreen


Nightforce ATACR Scope Review
By Jeff Brozovich

The new NightForce ATACR is for sure a top choice for any long range shooter. Read More


The total package. Nightforce is the best I have used as far as turret feel and solid detents. I have never had one that didn't track right on and always return to zero. Nightforce NXS is the best value for everything I need. -- Broz


Nightforce Velocity 1000 Reticle Review
By Scott Shreve

I think Nightforce knocked it outta the park with this reticle! Read More

NightForce


Top