Just curious, why the camoed out face? Is this a new thing? Is it fear of anti anti-hunters response? I once joined a hunting / magazine club kind of group that whited out any exposed skulls, skull plates, blood or anything on the kill site they felt was offensive on pictures they published. It was almost as if they were ashamed I'm showing what is part of the experience, harvesting game animals in an ethical way. I cancelled a magazine and the club membership. Mainly due to this reason but also because New Management raised the price. Perhaps in this not the case with your friend, he just doesn't want anybody to know who he is. I was wondering if it was because of California, the fact that he has to go back there to live and deal with anti Hunters. Some years ago I saw story where a famous female Hunter was ridiculed in the Press for posting pictures of her successful African hunt and harvests. Perhaps we've now moved into a period of our society where we need to be careful about publishing our image in hunting pictures. Thoughts from the members of this thread?