Farrell Bases- What good are they?

DixieFreedom

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2003
Messages
60
I am real frustrated now. I did not know, being a newbie that the Farrel base was so dang high! It simply will not work with my 40mm leupold Mark 4 scope, arggggg Too dang high and no options to correct it.

So where or when do Farrell bases shine? When mounting 56 mm objective lens night force scopes?
 

Michael Eichele

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2003
Messages
3,880
Location
The rifle range, or archery range or behind the co
I use the same set up. A 40mm mark 4 with KF base.

What kind of rings are you using?? It sounds like your rings might be too high. A short to medium high ring should be good for that set up. I am using Leupold QR medium rings. Those work real nice with that base. Maybe try using shorter rings. That base isnt that high.

[ 06-10-2004: Message edited by: meichele ]
 

marc357

Active Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2003
Messages
34
Location
Woodbine, MD
I kinda like the Farrel. I am using the Farrel base, with standard Farrel rings, and a 40mm obj. scope. I have just enough clearance for the Butler Creek scope caps to clear the barrel nicely.

I like the fact that the Farrel base is a little higher, as it makes it easier to load the cartridges into the magazine (I am shooting .300WM, more clearance for the fat cartridges)

Also, the slots for the rings are only at the ends, where you need them, not above the loading port. One less thing to bust your thumb on. (not that I have girly little thumbs or anything) Actually, I have big, fat, thumbs- maybe that's why I appreciate the extra clearance.

Shorter rings will probably correct your issue, but I know 150 bucks a set is steep.

I have seen ads from time to time, from folks in similar situations, wanting to trade Mediums for Lows, Lows for Highs, etc

Might be worth a look at the classifieds on this board and others.

marc
 

huntin1

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2003
Messages
80
Location
Jamestown, North Dakota
Dixie,

Check intothe Tactical Precision Systems TSR-W low rings. http://www.tacticalprecision.com/TSR%20W-Series.htm

They are very tough, cost around $75 , cheaper if you can get the discount at Brownells, they look good and work great, should get your scope low enough. I have a set of these on a 20-MOA Farrell baseusing a Sightron 4x16x42AO, and a set of Farrell standard rings on a 0-MOA Farrell base using a 3x9x40 Leupold Tactical. In one of your other posts I think you refered to there being a 3/8" gap between scope and barrel, I just don't see that as excessive, maybe it's just me. I want a good solid strong mount and I do not care so much about how much gap there is between the scope and barrel. As far as the cheek weld, most of the shooters I know have had to go to an adjustable cheekpiece or get some sort of stock pack and put a piece of foam in there to get to the right height.

Farrell 20-MOA base, TSR-W low rings, Sightron 4x16x42AO


Farrell 0-MOA base, Farrell standard rings, Leupold 3x9x40 Tactical


Hope this helps.

huntin1
 

DixieFreedom

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2003
Messages
60
Hey Michael...

Do you think you could measure the clearance of your objective from barrel? Are you using a varmint barrel?

Thanks so much for the help!
 

DixieFreedom

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2003
Messages
60
Mark357

Are you using a 30mm tube scope on your rifle?

I can get lower rings for a 1" scope but not for the 30mm, nonetheless I have some PRW loopies coming in the mail and I already have the farrel 20moa base.

Perhaps I will screw it together and see. Maybe I was misled!

Thanks very much for the replies, one and all.
 
G

Guest

Guest
I'm with Hunin1 , the TRS rings are great and a whole lot cheaper than the Leo's , AND , I have seen several cases where the Leo's had to be lapped alot more than the TRS
 

Michael Eichele

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2003
Messages
3,880
Location
The rifle range, or archery range or behind the co
DF,

I have roughly .575" from the objective to the top of my barrel. Yes I do have a varmint contour. For me this is a good height. This may be too high for some shooters. I am also using medium high rings and standard rings would fix this issue.

Also the 2 piece KF base is much lower if you want a 2 peice base.

I hope this helps!
 

marc357

Active Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2003
Messages
34
Location
Woodbine, MD
DF,
no, I am using a Shepherd, it has a 1-inch tube. It does sit slightly higher with the Farrel hardware, than the standard loopy stuff I was using... but I actually like it better. It allows the scope caps to clear the barrel when I spin the objective. With the lower mounting, the little nubs you use to pop the cap open would bump into the barrel.

marc
 

Trending threads

Nightforce has great tracking capabilities, they are rugged, a bunch of elevation, holds zero forever, and reticles are designed for long range shooting. So if you are looking to shoot long distances constantly, then you need a scope that can take the abuse. -- gilmillan1


Culture Of Excellence At Nightforce Optics
By Len Backus

A high level of quality both in production and in service. Read More


Nightforce is such a solid combo of reticle, available elevation, glass that is good enough to shoot at the longest range you can dial. Nightforce has bullet proof construction that can handle the incidental horse rolling or some other rodeo action. -- bigngreen


Nightforce ATACR Scope Review
By Jeff Brozovich

The new NightForce ATACR is for sure a top choice for any long range shooter. Read More


The total package. Nightforce is the best I have used as far as turret feel and solid detents. I have never had one that didn't track right on and always return to zero. Nightforce NXS is the best value for everything I need. -- Broz


Nightforce Velocity 1000 Reticle Review
By Scott Shreve

I think Nightforce knocked it outta the park with this reticle! Read More

NightForce


Top