.270 Win Ackley Improved - 270 WSM

kopcicle

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2023
Messages
63
Location
Washington
If I already have a .270 AI what are the advantages of a 270 WSM other than the more compact action?

I've spent a long time with .277" but none with WSM.
 
I was checking out a 6.8 western at local gunshop, seemed interesting. After checking reload data I was wondering if getting a remage in 270win with a 7.5 twist and longer throat might do the same job. Hate to mess with my 270win though.

Stick with the AI of you already have one.
 
If I already have a .270 AI what are the advantages of a 270 WSM other than the more compact action?

I've spent a long time with .277" but none with WSM.
It depends on your intended purpose. What are the specs on your .270 AI, and what bullets are you loading?

I have a .270 AI with a 30" Lilja 1:8" 3G specifically built to propel the 165/175 Matrix VLDs, and the 170 Bergers.

The .270 WSM has a slight powder capacity advantage. The challenge might be brass availability.
 
Even .270Win with fast twist 1:8 or faster in sufficient long action, throated with freebore will hold its own. It will kick 6.8W butt IMO. I built one on 700LA, 3.67" COAL, 0.290 freebore, 27", 1:8, 5R that has shocked the crap out of me on performance.
 
What are the specs on your .270 AI
Semi conventional
07-063-BGC-270.gif

The bullets have been a large variety of 140gr to date.
130's and 150's not so much.

I'm really not a fan of heavies in .277.
I do however see the advantage in BC with added weight/length/solid-mono.
I've just been stuck in conventional 1:10 twist since the 70's
I suppose that if I ever got a quicker twist I'd be right in there pitching 165's

I'm looking at the WSM because I have a confusion of LR/AR-308 parts and a lathe ;-)
I should probably forgo any discussion about the .270 WSM and just neck a .308 to .277 and take out the body taper and sharpen the shoulder. In essence, 277-08 AI
 
Last edited:
If I remember correctly the 270 AI would usually take more rounds in the magazine of standard stocked rifles. On a chassis then that's nullified. Brass should be easier to get for 270 AI to fire form.
 
So if the 270 AI you owned was a heavy barreled rifle and you wanted a lighter walking stick then a 270 WSM could fit that bill and keep the ammo from getting mixed up. Or a light 270 AI and if you wanted a heavy barreled version then a 270 WSM could fit that bill. Again only if you wanted to keep the ammo separated from the two rifles.
 
A fair portion of my 270 brass started life as 30-06 LC
Too bad the WSM uses a .505 face :-/
It's not like I have a glut of 404 Jeffery around.
So as above, .277-08 AI ?
I think I'd to a 7mm-08 AI or SAW. But if you love the .277 then a .277-08 AI or .277-284 Win certainly would be entertaining ;). Or even a straight .277-08. Heck how about a .277 CM and tell all the 6.5 CM fans that the .277 is much more efficient lol.
 
The .270 AI is a pre 64 70 medium profile Douglas 1:10 in Reinhart Fajen wood. Not that light but not a porker either. I didn't chamber this one. It came to me as is and is an old friend.

The plain Jane .270 is a BSA CF2 1:10 bone stock save for the trigger.
The trigger was a mess when I purchased the rifle and parts were hard to find. Oddly I never got a Timney to work. I understand that Timney made a trigger to fit the CS2 but I think I kept getting the wrong one. Out of frustration I built my own using what what was left of the BSA parts as a pattern.
Honestly I'd like to find another CF2 action to play with.
 
Top