How long is your ignore list?

Why not? If it was a utility patent, it would offer something unique, but being as it's only an Ornamental Design patent, the parabolic BS is just that...parabolic BS. There is no utility in the arched cannelures, AFAICT.

It has never been my intention to bad mouth the Hammer folks. It was my intention to walk away and let them sell bullets to folks that will buy them.

That later part doesn't seem possible with people like @WYO300RUM 🤷‍♂️ He now brings up another forum, which I WASN'T banned from. But who cares, I've been banned from much more poplar sights than HammerTime...🤷‍♂️
My point was that it is just a bullet. Once we moved past the mini ball, they are all too much alike to patent on other than looks.
A utility patent would involve something new and unthought of, not much radical new to bullets.
 
My point was that it is just a bullet. Once we moved past the mini ball, they are all too much alike to patent on other than looks.
A utility patent would involve something new and unthought of, not much radical new to bullets.
SMH
 
My point was that it is just a bullet. Once we moved past the mini ball, they are all too much alike to patent on other than looks.
A utility patent would involve something new and unthought of, not much radical new to bullets.
Well, it's just a bullet that has evolved quite a bit, IMO.

Barnes first came out with the X bullet in '89. Nowadays the newer bullets are machined out of copper, and I think that takes us one step further than the Barnes. The LRX is a tough bullet to beat, value wise. AFAIK, Barnes casts their bullets. There are expanding vs fracturing bullets also.

I can see your point if the Minié ball taking us back to the Jacketed Projectile, but it just seems a bit more complicated than that, and if it wasn't I bet some of us would find other pastimes.
 
When the heck did this become a bullet hater's thread??? Was I in a coma or something???
Someone posted about how they hadn't seen any posts where people were insulted or disrespected, I posted that they should have seen some of the hammer threads back in the day and then bam two pages of arguing about hammer bullets.

I logged back in at 11pm last night while walking back and forth between two tricklers because Trailboss meters slower than molasses and laughed because that comment added two pages about hammer bullets pretty much proving my previous statement still stands.
 
Well, it's just a bullet that has evolved quite a bit, IMO.

Barnes first came out with the X bullet in '89. Nowadays the newer bullets are machined out of copper, and I think that takes us one step further than the Barnes. The LRX is a tough bullet to beat, value wise. AFAIK, Barnes casts their bullets. There are expanding vs fracturing bullets also.

I can see your point if the Minié ball taking us back to the Jacketed Projectile, but it just seems a bit more complicated than that, and if it wasn't I bet some of us would find other pastimes.
They are still just bullets, same general shapes, same materials, tips/untipped, solids/exposed points, changing jacket thickness, etc.
Nothing new to utility patent.
Do we have better designed bullets, yes. Better tollerances, yes.
But, they are still bullets, not really something new to patent.
 
They are still just bullets, same general shapes, same materials, tips/untipped, solids/exposed points, changing jacket thickness, etc.
Nothing new to utility patent.
Do we have better designed bullets, yes. Better tollerances, yes.
But, they are still bullets, not really something new to patent.
You are way behind in said conversation and in the wrong section of the library, no offense intended
 
Back
Top