Scope advice NF ATACR or Swarovski X5i

Discussion in 'Long Range Hunting & Shooting' started by ndczerwinski, Aug 25, 2018.

  1. ndczerwinski

    ndczerwinski Member

    Messages:
    21
    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2017
    I have narrowed my scope choice for my new 6.5 PRC long range hunting rifle down to the following choices:
    -NF ATACR 4-16x50 SFP MOAR
    -Swarovski X5i 3.5-18x50 4WXi

    Hunting will mostly be 300 to 800 yds, but I would like to be able to use it at close range as well occasionally so that’s why I selected thing magnification range.

    I am interested In hearing from people who have used both. I am curious as to how they compare in clarity, low light performance, and tracking mainly. I have looked through a lot of scopes and have done a lot of research and I’m not interested in anything else. Thanks.
     
  2. Rhovee

    Rhovee Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    357
    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2017
    I own two X5’s and they are amazing scopes. Turrets are a little tall. But everything else is spot on. Glass. Tracking. I do not have an Atacr. Thought about buying one.
     
    Ingwe and Idaho Trecker like this.
  3. Deviant

    Deviant Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    96
    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2018
    I give a slight edge to Swarovski for the glass and to Nightforce for durability. As far as tracking both of my Atacr scopes and the Swarovski are spot on.

    Al
     
  4. Brightwhite

    Brightwhite Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    51
    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2018
    That’s a tough choice and I am considering the same two scopes on a 300wsm build. The one turn off I keep seeing is that the swaro zero stop is difficult to set and a complete pain with the propriety swaro tool you need. i don’t know why they had to make that zero stop so difficult.
     
    Ingwe likes this.
  5. Brightwhite

    Brightwhite Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    51
    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2018
    Also...I personally think the illumination system is better in the NF from playing with them at a store. If you haven’t fondled them, you might want to do that, you’ll see all of the little nuances that help make your decision.
     
  6. Rhett Crider

    Rhett Crider Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    48
    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2018
    I've never owned a Swarovski but do own 3 of the ATACRs and they are excellent. I would suggest going w/ the MOAR-T or C555. Illumination of the center crosshair to me is not as distracting at dusk or dawn and if you dial, that's all you'll need. Very good glass too. My first one was the MOAR or C553. As Brightwhite said, might check them out first. I've been buying new demos for $2230 price range to save a few dollars also. I've heard a lot of good about Swarvo too so you're probably good w/ either. Good look and hope you find a deal.

    Rhett
     
  7. Rhett Crider

    Rhett Crider Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    48
    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2018
    BTW-my reply was on 5 x 25s not 4 x 16s. But I believe the reticles are the same.

    Rhett
     
  8. ndczerwinski

    ndczerwinski Member

    Messages:
    21
    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2017
    I agree I prefer the illuminated center better unfortunately they only make it is the 5-25 version
     
  9. imyourhuckleberry

    imyourhuckleberry Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    74
    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2009
    I prefer the Nightforce over the Swaroski for the following reasons.

    1. Optical clarity to my eyes is about equal, to me there is no discernible difference.
    2. The Swarovski is about $500 more
    3. The zero stop for the Swaro requires a proprietary tool.
    4. The Nightforce has more Moa or mil elevation than Swaroski
     
  10. Rhett Crider

    Rhett Crider Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    48
    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2018
    You can switch from red to green and green is definitely not as glaring. Again, at least on the 5 x 25.
     
  11. snookntarpon

    snookntarpon Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    182
    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2011
    I have the 4-16x44 ATACR
    Swaro Z8i 2.5-16x50
    swaro wins with glass, but the atacr is really good.
    switched to swaro due to weight of the atacr. if they weighed the same i would take the atacr because i like the moar reticle a lot and the turrets are awesome.
    getting ready to sell the atacr.
    SnT
     
  12. hrnhntr

    hrnhntr Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    78
    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2012
    ATACR! I have a couple including the 4-16F1. Increase LE glass, very durable, and great tracking. I dropped/fell on mine sheep hunting and had zero point of aim shift.
     
  13. WRO

    WRO Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    154
    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2007
    Tool is not that big of a deal..

    I've used it twice, because I don't really mess with 0 once I'm sighted in.

    I like the eye box better in the x5 than the actar. I've shot both, but the vast majority of my time is behind an X5.
     
  14. TJ_1985

    TJ_1985 Active Member LRH Team Member

    Messages:
    29
    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2018
    Also interested in who wins at low light. I have a z6i 2.5x18x56 now and was wanting a scope for long range hunting and shooting since the z6i isn’t much on long range target shooting. However if you can’t see it you can’t shoot it. My Swarvoski does the best job of any scope I have ever tried in low light, however haven’t tried the atacr yet. My buddy has one and I am gonna try and get it and compare the two before I purchase another scope.