Scope advice NF ATACR or Swarovski X5i

ndczerwinski

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2017
Messages
45
I have narrowed my scope choice for my new 6.5 PRC long range hunting rifle down to the following choices:
-NF ATACR 4-16x50 SFP MOAR
-Swarovski X5i 3.5-18x50 4WXi

Hunting will mostly be 300 to 800 yds, but I would like to be able to use it at close range as well occasionally so that’s why I selected thing magnification range.

I am interested In hearing from people who have used both. I am curious as to how they compare in clarity, low light performance, and tracking mainly. I have looked through a lot of scopes and have done a lot of research and I’m not interested in anything else. Thanks.
 

Rhovee

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2017
Messages
1,058
I own two X5’s and they are amazing scopes. Turrets are a little tall. But everything else is spot on. Glass. Tracking. I do not have an Atacr. Thought about buying one.
 

Deviant

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2018
Messages
528
Location
Nebraska
I give a slight edge to Swarovski for the glass and to Nightforce for durability. As far as tracking both of my Atacr scopes and the Swarovski are spot on.

Al
 

Brightwhite

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2018
Messages
75
Location
Colorado
That’s a tough choice and I am considering the same two scopes on a 300wsm build. The one turn off I keep seeing is that the swaro zero stop is difficult to set and a complete pain with the propriety swaro tool you need. i don’t know why they had to make that zero stop so difficult.
 

Brightwhite

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2018
Messages
75
Location
Colorado
Also...I personally think the illumination system is better in the NF from playing with them at a store. If you haven’t fondled them, you might want to do that, you’ll see all of the little nuances that help make your decision.
 

Rhett Crider

Well-Known Member
LRH Team Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2018
Messages
361
Location
Texas
I've never owned a Swarovski but do own 3 of the ATACRs and they are excellent. I would suggest going w/ the MOAR-T or C555. Illumination of the center crosshair to me is not as distracting at dusk or dawn and if you dial, that's all you'll need. Very good glass too. My first one was the MOAR or C553. As Brightwhite said, might check them out first. I've been buying new demos for $2230 price range to save a few dollars also. I've heard a lot of good about Swarvo too so you're probably good w/ either. Good look and hope you find a deal.

Rhett
 

Rhett Crider

Well-Known Member
LRH Team Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2018
Messages
361
Location
Texas
BTW-my reply was on 5 x 25s not 4 x 16s. But I believe the reticles are the same.

Rhett
 

imyourhuckleberry

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2009
Messages
217
Location
texas
I prefer the Nightforce over the Swaroski for the following reasons.

1. Optical clarity to my eyes is about equal, to me there is no discernible difference.
2. The Swarovski is about $500 more
3. The zero stop for the Swaro requires a proprietary tool.
4. The Nightforce has more Moa or mil elevation than Swaroski
 

snookntarpon

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2011
Messages
273
Location
FL
I have the 4-16x44 ATACR
Swaro Z8i 2.5-16x50
swaro wins with glass, but the atacr is really good.
switched to swaro due to weight of the atacr. if they weighed the same i would take the atacr because i like the moar reticle a lot and the turrets are awesome.
getting ready to sell the atacr.
SnT
 

hrnhntr

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2012
Messages
218
Location
Colorado
ATACR! I have a couple including the 4-16F1. Increase LE glass, very durable, and great tracking. I dropped/fell on mine sheep hunting and had zero point of aim shift.
 

WRO

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2007
Messages
152
Tool is not that big of a deal..

I've used it twice, because I don't really mess with 0 once I'm sighted in.

I like the eye box better in the x5 than the actar. I've shot both, but the vast majority of my time is behind an X5.
 

TJ_1985

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2018
Messages
83
Location
Hartsville SC
Also interested in who wins at low light. I have a z6i 2.5x18x56 now and was wanting a scope for long range hunting and shooting since the z6i isn’t much on long range target shooting. However if you can’t see it you can’t shoot it. My Swarvoski does the best job of any scope I have ever tried in low light, however haven’t tried the atacr yet. My buddy has one and I am gonna try and get it and compare the two before I purchase another scope.
 

Trending threads

Top