Lost please help

Sam, Could you do me a favor and double-check your case length. With a coal of 3.646, I'm getting a negative shank seat depth from quikload using the standard 30-06 case length of 2.494. If your cases are this length, then you don't have the billet seated deeply enough at 3.646... At least by quikload's figures. The longest cartridge length for a case length of 2.494, is 3.600.

If you could do me the kindness of confirming your powder charge and case length, it would be ver helpful.

Thanks.
 
Coal is 3.328. Case length is 2.475. Charge is 51.7 of H4350. CBTO is 2.646. 210 grain berger VLD. Winchester LRM primer. 27" barrel. Thanks J. Sorry It has taken me so long to get back with you. Just had Boy number 3! At the hospital right now. Figured I would get on here and checkout longrangehunting while wife and baby take a nap
 
Sam... Congrats on the newest boy. You're a lot braver than me. One boy 14 and two daughters that are all grown up. They were hers 8 years ago, but we've managed to get them to be ours. Was rough for a while but tons of patience, love and hitting my head against the wall in private... and my wife and I both won over the others children. We feel very lucky as it doesn't always work out like that! But she and I both agree... No more babies! Lol. Hence the brave comment!!!

So... Here's your loadout! Good luck and everything looks good. I'll be keeping my fingers crossed for ya.

James

----------

Cartridge : .30-06 Spring.
Bullet : .308, 210, Berger VLD
Cartridge O.A.L. L6: 3.328 inch or 84.53 mm
Barrel Length : 27.0 inch or 685.8 mm
Powder : Hodgdon H4350

Predicted data by increasing and decreasing the given charge,
incremented in steps of 2.0% of nominal charge.
CAUTION: Figures exceed maximum and minimum recommended loads !

Step Fill. Charge Vel. Energy Pmax Pmuz Prop.Burnt B_Time
% % Grains fps ft.lbs psi psi % ms

-20.0 77 41.36 2120 2096 28591 6437 93.9 1.838
-18.0 79 42.39 2170 2195 30423 6619 94.9 1.791
-16.0 81 43.43 2219 2297 32373 6793 95.8 1.744
-14.0 83 44.46 2269 2401 34448 6959 96.6 1.699
-12.0 85 45.50 2319 2507 36658 7115 97.3 1.655
-10.0 87 46.53 2368 2614 39011 7261 98.0 1.609
-08.0 89 47.56 2417 2724 41520 7397 98.6 1.564
-06.0 91 48.60 2466 2835 44178 7522 99.0 1.521
-04.0 93 49.63 2514 2947 47049 7634 99.4 1.479
-02.0 95 50.67 2562 3061 50098 7735 99.7 1.439 ! Near Maximum !
+00.0 97 51.70 2610 3177 53357 7822 99.9 1.400 ! Near Maximum !
+02.0 99 52.73 2658 3293 56843 7897 100.0 1.362 ! Near Maximum !
+04.0 100 53.77 2705 3411 60577 7959 100.0 1.326 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+06.0 102 54.80 2751 3529 64579 8016 100.0 1.291 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+08.0 104 55.84 2797 3649 68874 8071 100.0 1.257 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+10.0 106 56.87 2843 3770 73480 8123 100.0 1.224 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!

Results caused by ± 10% powder lot-to-lot burning rate variation using nominal charge
Data for burning rate increased by 10% relative to nominal value:
+Ba 97 51.70 2709 3422 64263 7488 100.0 1.304 !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Data for burning rate decreased by 10% relative to nominal value:
-Ba 97 51.70 2464 2832 43536 7863 96.2 1.525
 
wow, I figured that by seating the bullet further into the case. That I wouldn't be able to have as much of a powder charge, but by this info that is not the case.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 10 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Recent Posts

Top