D
daveosok
Guest
As a member of a family whose still in England and whose cousin is a Bobby with the City of London the one square mile section of London actually called The City of London and where one of the bombings happened not less than 100 yards from her station.
I would ask of her that she run to the individual only after firing shots as approaching anybody acting in a suspicious manner dressed in a manner easily concealable for weapons or bombs and taking into account the horrific bombings that happened that she be justified in her actions as to think twice may cost the lives of another 50 plus people or worse.
The maybe aspect of this is a huge burden to carry, but for those who seek to prevent it any means should be used as the outcome of choosing not to would possibly lead to and more likely lead to the deaths and destruction of many more people. Given the past bombings and war or terror and given the time of year the man who was shot be it while down on the ground or running was wearing articles of clothing inappropriate for time of year.
You don't see LA gang members wearing trench coats in 115 degree weather they just carry their stuff in plain sight or in their "ride", nor do you see a foreign person who has exited a house under suspicion wearing a bulky coat with less regard than approaching a hooptie in the hood filled with gang members.
They aren't Boy Scouts in the car and that wasn't just a man in a coat running, it was a man running in a coat towards the underground and was at the wrong place at the wrong time and left the wrong house and did the wrong thing.
Ignoring the polices efforts at verbal suggestions to stop or halt only escalated matters.
The question to ask would be if he had not been stopped and had been a bomber and carried out his plan the officers involved would have be hung just as high as if they had indeed done what happened. Double edged sword here either way you swing it your gonna hit some S-it.
Hindsight is always 20/20.
I would ask of her that she run to the individual only after firing shots as approaching anybody acting in a suspicious manner dressed in a manner easily concealable for weapons or bombs and taking into account the horrific bombings that happened that she be justified in her actions as to think twice may cost the lives of another 50 plus people or worse.
The maybe aspect of this is a huge burden to carry, but for those who seek to prevent it any means should be used as the outcome of choosing not to would possibly lead to and more likely lead to the deaths and destruction of many more people. Given the past bombings and war or terror and given the time of year the man who was shot be it while down on the ground or running was wearing articles of clothing inappropriate for time of year.
You don't see LA gang members wearing trench coats in 115 degree weather they just carry their stuff in plain sight or in their "ride", nor do you see a foreign person who has exited a house under suspicion wearing a bulky coat with less regard than approaching a hooptie in the hood filled with gang members.
They aren't Boy Scouts in the car and that wasn't just a man in a coat running, it was a man running in a coat towards the underground and was at the wrong place at the wrong time and left the wrong house and did the wrong thing.
Ignoring the polices efforts at verbal suggestions to stop or halt only escalated matters.
The question to ask would be if he had not been stopped and had been a bomber and carried out his plan the officers involved would have be hung just as high as if they had indeed done what happened. Double edged sword here either way you swing it your gonna hit some S-it.
Hindsight is always 20/20.