leupold vs. simmons which is better?

I suspect there is a reason that there is always a large supply of rebuilt Simmons on the market.

FWIW the first Zeiss I had fell apart but was replaced.

After looking through and sighting in a number of guns with Simmons, one just a week ago, I'd never buy one personally. Just not nearly as clear as a good scope should be. Though I can say that one 300 mag I zero'd in knocked the front lense loose BUT the simmons held its zero.

Anymore nowdays I'd prefer to buy one Leica or Zeiss to 2 of anything else.

BTW those that put the big 50 mm heavy scopes on the big rifles are putting a big strain on the mounts and scope. Where was that thread that the euro scopes are so good in quality(last LPS I looked at was fairly close also) that they accomplish in 40-44 mm what normal 50s do. No need for those big ends and extra weight an misery IMHO

Jeff
 
Warning! This thread is more than 20 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.
Top