H.R.176 Fed CCW

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by Nomad, May 9, 2011.

  1. Nomad

    Nomad Banned

    Messages:
    366
    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2007
    « on: May 08, 2011, 07:41:13 PM »
    Reply with quoteQuote Modify messageModify Remove messageRemove
    The Californication Of Concealed Carry
    Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA) introduced S. 176, the Common Sense Concealed Firearms Permit Act of 2011, last week. The text has finally become available.

    This bill, if passed, would convert "shall issue" concealed carry back to "may issue" nationwide. Moreover, it would abolish constitutional carry. The bill sets the requirement to show "good cause" which is at the center of lawsuits such as Kachalsky v Cacace, Peruta v San Diego, Muller v Maenza, and Woollard v Sheridan.

    Nowhere in the bill is any justification or finding that a Federal standard for concealed carry is constitutional. Traditionally, police powers, i.e. relating to health, safety, and welfare, have been left to the states.

    A BILL

    To establish minimum standards for States that allow the carrying of concealed firearms.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

    SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the `Common Sense Concealed Firearms Permit Act of 2011'.

    SEC. 2. CONCEALED FIREARMS PERMITS.

    (a) In General- Chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 926C, the following:

    `Sec. 926D. Concealed firearms permits

    `(a) In General- Each State that allows residents of the State to carry concealed firearms shall--

    `(1) establish a process to issue permits to residents of the State to carry concealed firearms; and

    `(2) require that each resident of the State seeking to carry a concealed firearm in the State obtain a permit through the process established under paragraph (1).

    `(b) Requirements- In establishing a process to issue permits to carry concealed firearms under subsection (a), a State shall--

    `(1) ensure that a local law enforcement agency participates in the process; and

    `(2) at a minimum, require that an applicant for a permit to carry a concealed firearm--

    `(A) be a legal resident of the United States;

    `(B) be not less than 21 years of age;

    `(C) demonstrate good cause for requesting a concealed firearm permit; and

    `(D) demonstrate that the applicant is worthy of the public trust to carry a concealed firearm in public.

    `(c) Law Enforcement Agency Report- If a State establishes a process under subsection (a) that allows for an agency other than a law enforcement agency to issue permits to carry concealed firearms, the process shall require that--

    `(1) a local law enforcement agency submit to the agency responsible for issuing permits a written report that describes whether the applicant meets the standards of the State to carry a concealed firearm; and

    `(2) the agency responsible for issuing permits maintain a report submitted under paragraph (1) in the file of the applicant.

    `(d) Definition- In this section, the term `local law enforcement agency' means a law enforcement agency of the unit of local government with jurisdiction of the area in which the applicant for a permit to carry a concealed firearm resides.

    `(e) Compliance- Not later than 270 days after the date of enactment of this section, each State described in subsection (a) shall be in compliance with this section.'.

    (b) Technical and Conforming Amendment- The table of sections for chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 926C the following:

    `926D. Concealed firearms permits.'.

    Posted by John Richardson at 8:00 AM
    Labels: Barbara Boxer, concealed carry
     
  2. Kevin Thomas

    Kevin Thomas Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,256
    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2009
    Nomad,

    Keep us posted here, but I would certainly hope that there's a 10th amendment challenge to this IMMEDIATELY. In the meantime, we all need to get the word off to our own representatives and cut this one off at the pass.
     
  3. buckfynn

    buckfynn Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    77
    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2011
    I am amazed at the lack of publicity on this issue.

    Hopefully it will die in committee before going before a vote in the House.

    And my hat is off to Alaska, Arizona, Vermont, and Wyoming for having legal unrestricted concealed carry laws without requiring a permit. Montana allows unrestricted concealed carry outside of incorporated areas, but a concealed carry permit is required to carry concealed within the limits of an incorporated city or town.

    Utah, South Carolina, and New Hampshire are also considering unrestricted legislation.