• If you are being asked to change your password, and unsure how to do it, follow these instructions. Click here

300 WSM 200 gr ELD-X & RL-23

Engineering101

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2013
Messages
1,047
Location
Maple Valley, Washington
I can see why nobody is using this powder/bullet combo. I loaded some and could only get 63 grains in the case which, with a relatively slow burn rate (0.4090 per quickload) should be pretty low on the performance scale. The odd thing is that I can get 68 grains of RL-26 in the case and it is even slower at 0.3397 but it gives me 2,939 fps and good accuracy with an ES of 15. I thought RL-23 would be a more appropriate powder for this chambering but it looks like the only thing going for it is temp stability and reduced copper fouling. Per Hornady data RL-17 or Hunter give max performance in the 300 WSM but it looks like RL-26 could be added to that list but not RL-23.
 
Stick with RL-17 and 62.8gr per Hornday. I got one ragged hole and 2952 fps. The group didn't tighten up until I seated it at 2.855" (Hornady load data) from my usual COAL of 2.860".
 
Stick with RL-17 and 62.8gr per Hornday. I got one ragged hole and 2952 fps. The group didn't tighten up until I seated it at 2.855" (Hornady load data) from my usual COAL of 2.860".


What is the length of your barrel? I have 50 rounds loaded of the 200 grain eldx and RL 17. I hope to find an accuracy node where I achieve that speed.
 
I was wrong. RL-23 does appear to be viable. I got 2,875 fps with 63 grains of RL-23 pushing the 200 grain ELD-X out of a 26 inch tube. Not to bad. Nice to know since this powder is supposed to exhibit rock solid temp stability with little copper fouling. There is certainly nothing wrong with RL-17 though.
 
Warning! This thread is more than 8 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.

Recent Posts

Top