.260 Rem. Load Data for ELD-X

17Fireball

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2012
Messages
208
Looking for the page from the new Hornady manual that is for the .260 Rem. and 143 grain bullets (ie. ELD-X). Appreciate if anyone could take a photo and send it to me or post. Will pick one up when I get to town but my manual is older and does not include this data.
 
Cartridge : .260 Rem
Bullet : .264, 143, Hornady ELD-X 2635
Useable Case Capaci: 44.764 grain H2O = 2.907 cm³
Cartridge O.A.L. L6: 2.800 inch = 71.12 mm
Barrel Length : 22.0 inch = 558.8 mm

Predicted Data for Indicated Charges of the Following Powders.
Matching Maximum Pressure: 52666 psi, or 363 MPa
or a maximum loading ratio or filling of 100 %
These calculations refer to your specified settings in QuickLOAD 'Cartridge Dimensions' window.
C A U T I O N : any load listed can result in a powder charge that falls below minimum suggested
loads or exceeds maximum suggested loads as presented in current handloading manuals. Understand
that all of the listed powders can be unsuitable for the given combination of cartridge, bullet
and gun. Actual load order can vary, depending upon lot-to-lot powder and component variations.
USE ONLY FOR COMPARISON !

11 loads produced a Loading Ratio below user-defined minimum of 90%. These powders have been skipped.
Powder type Filling/Loading Ratio Charge Charge Vel. Prop.Burnt P max P muzz B_Time
% Grains Gramm fps % psi psi ms
--------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------
ReloadSwiss RS 60 93.6 40.5 2.62 2682 100.0 52667 10363 1.206 ! Near Maximum !
ReloadSwiss RS 70 99.9 43.9 2.85 2675 98.3 52667 11190 1.204 ! Near Maximum !
Alliant Reloder-17 92.6 40.1 2.60 2661 100.0 52667 10295 1.213 ! Near Maximum !
Elcho 17 92.6 40.1 2.60 2661 100.0 52667 10295 1.213 ! Near Maximum !
Somchem S365 99.5 40.8 2.65 2641 100.0 52667 9854 1.225 ! Near Maximum !
Alliant Reloder-16 99.1 39.8 2.58 2638 100.0 52667 10174 1.225 ! Near Maximum !
ReloadSwiss RS 62 96.1 41.6 2.69 2634 99.6 52667 10396 1.233 ! Near Maximum !
Alliant Reloder-26 100.0 44.4 2.87 2630 99.0 46365 11484 1.279
PB Clermont PCL 511 94.0 41.3 2.68 2625 98.7 52667 10454 1.222 ! Near Maximum !
Ramshot Hunter 97.2 41.4 2.68 2623 98.7 52667 10440 1.223 ! Near Maximum !
Hodgdon H414 91.6 40.0 2.59 2614 98.0 52667 10382 1.227 ! Near Maximum !
Winchester 760 91.6 40.0 2.59 2614 98.0 52667 10382 1.227 ! Near Maximum !
Norma URP 96.5 39.4 2.55 2607 99.6 52667 10064 1.232 ! Near Maximum !
Bofors RP19 ~approximation 96.5 39.4 2.55 2607 99.6 52667 10061 1.232 ! Near Maximum !
Accurate 4350 96.2 39.7 2.57 2607 99.7 52667 10090 1.249 ! Near Maximum !
Vihtavuori N550 93.6 39.5 2.56 2605 99.6 52667 10163 1.237 ! Near Maximum !
Norma 204 96.2 41.0 2.66 2593 96.1 52667 10272 1.220 ! Near Maximum !
Raufoss RA4 99.3 41.0 2.66 2593 96.1 52667 10272 1.220 ! Near Maximum !
Bofors RP4 ~approximation 99.3 41.0 2.66 2593 96.1 52667 10272 1.220 ! Near Maximum !
ADI AR 2209 100.0 41.0 2.66 2589 95.9 51200 10408 1.227 ! Near Maximum !
Norma MRP 100.0 43.1 2.79 2586 96.5 46216 11166 1.285
Hodgdon Hybrid 100V 99.3 39.6 2.57 2580 100.0 52667 9320 1.229 ! Near Maximum !
Bofors RP4 NT ~approximation 96.9 40.6 2.63 2577 97.8 52667 10005 1.235 ! Near Maximum !
Alliant Reloder-19 100.0 41.3 2.67 2576 95.8 50149 10426 1.245
Winchester Supreme 780 100.0 43.5 2.82 2564 96.0 51765 10034 1.231 ! Near Maximum !
Lovex S070 95.8 39.1 2.53 2560 98.2 52667 9819 1.247 ! Near Maximum !
IMR 4831 100.0 39.5 2.56 2559 99.5 50430 9789 1.266
Rottweil R904 99.8 40.6 2.63 2559 95.0 52667 9922 1.226 ! Near Maximum !
Rottweil R903 91.1 37.2 2.41 2556 100.0 52667 9252 1.257 ! Near Maximum !
Bofors RP14 ~approximation 100.0 41.3 2.67 2551 95.5 48994 10274 1.259
Somchem S355 91.0 36.7 2.38 2549 100.0 52667 9227 1.251 ! Near Maximum !
IMR 7828 SSC 100.0 42.4 2.75 2547 92.8 46814 10697 1.273
Lovex S065 94.4 38.1 2.47 2540 98.9 52667 9484 1.248
 
Would you mind running the same data with a 24" barrel and a seating depth at 2.895 please with lap brass
 
Warning! This thread is more than 6 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.
Top