BrentM
Well-Known Member
My first experience with custom Nosler brass is for my 204. I have been very happy with it. For my 6.5-284 rifles I have been using Lapua brass. However, I figured I would try Nosler custom for this new barrel and unfired brass was giving me very good results. Fire formed brass is not as good with the same load which has caused me to work up a new load. I noticed a little pressure signs with the same charge etc etc. Heavier bolt lift, little flattening of the primer, and very slight ejector marks.
Generally fire formed brass is the most accurate and consistent from what I have been able to tell. I typically body size with a Redding body die and bump the shoulder and bushing neck size .002 under loaded neck diameter. I use Federal match primers, same lot. I same lot everything during load development.
So the only thing I notice that is significantly different is neck tension. While seating a bullet in the new brass vs fired brass the tension is significant.
1. I have heard Nosler brass does not handle pressure as well as Lapau and there fore I may not be able to get to desired charge levels without seeing a bit of pressure. True or False?
2. Neck tension is generally believed to be best at .002. Is this still the correct rule of thumb?
Generally fire formed brass is the most accurate and consistent from what I have been able to tell. I typically body size with a Redding body die and bump the shoulder and bushing neck size .002 under loaded neck diameter. I use Federal match primers, same lot. I same lot everything during load development.
So the only thing I notice that is significantly different is neck tension. While seating a bullet in the new brass vs fired brass the tension is significant.
1. I have heard Nosler brass does not handle pressure as well as Lapau and there fore I may not be able to get to desired charge levels without seeing a bit of pressure. True or False?
2. Neck tension is generally believed to be best at .002. Is this still the correct rule of thumb?