I am looking for a new rifle in 7mm-08. Love the caliber for most of my midwest hunting needs. I found a Christensen Ridgeline at a pretty decent price but am hesitant due to a lot of naysayers on the forums. Some people really like the rifle and others wouldn't touch it. This will be a hunting rifle and I rarely shoot over 300 yds, so I am leaning towards taking a chance. I know I may have opened a can of worms here but would like some honest opinions. I heard that CA did have quality issues in the past, but are now putting out better quality rifles.
I've tried my friend's in 300wm? i don't remember. I was initially impressed, as much with him being able to get one as that it was almost new in box.
He puts an ultra light scope on it and I found the recoil to be a little harsher than my mauser m12 in 300. Accuracy was meh, but it hadn't had 20 rounds out of it. Fit and finish are as you would expect, top notch. Quite ergonomic, but a little long for me, but I am short, 5'9.
Accuracy was great for him, and loved it, but I know he did "some work" to it, but he would spit polish a perfect mirror so I don't think that's indicative of what's required or even reasonable for it to be great.
He ended up sending it back and getting a new one about 18-24 months later (in 308) but wouldn't elaborate why, has had it for maybe 5yr and puts a LOT of rounds through it, probably 2 range days a week (1 in winter and 3+in summer). Although he sent back a modern precision shortly after they first came out, one of the first in Canada apparently, for barrel de-laminating, promptly sold it, I didn't get to try it
Last year i did get to try it and a sako 85 bravarian (some custom finish on the stock, otherwise stock) sako l579 full stock well loved, Savage 110 (super custom, why a basic Savage to start I don't know, not my money) and tikka t3x (trigger work, minor stock work) all in 308 and side by side.
Glass aside, 4/5 of us (the CA owner found no fault with his gun, others 'need work' he's that type of guy) ranked them 85, CA, Savage, tikka, l579 (requires a sholder surgery after every other box) for comfort.
85/CA tied, Savage, tikka (its a hunting rifle) , l579 for finish.
Accuracy was l579 (by far, factory lapua 175g sen-L, it's outrageous), same nosler 168 match for the rest(they didn't like the lapua) savage and CA were close I think 0.75ish moa (or better), 85 was about 1moa and the tikka doesn't like that ammo and was way off (normally 1.5moa with hornady 165 whitetail, better with match)
Cool was CA, Savage, l579 (mannlicher, what can I say), 85, tikka
Hunting CA, tikka (plastic stock, something just right), 579, 85, Savage. But we are all afraid to take expensive things into harms way.
Weight (low to high) CA, tikka, 579, 85, Savage.
We were equally split and opposite on want/worth it between the 85 and CA.
Value now CA but in 10,20,30 years we all picked the 85. Between the 3 other guys they bought 1 sako carbon, CA Mesa, and CA Mesa long range, no issues and lots of love for the CA. Long range especially.
Personally I want the CA, but would go for a Mesa titanium for a light weight hunting option. Zero quality issues reported, although everyone got new mags, who doesn't. Can't go wrong.