Ca approved bullets?

Which mono are you using? The Hornady ELD-X is great bullet for what it is intended for. Its intended to work great for the medium to longer range hunting space. It is a cup and core bullet with a lead core and a small internal locking ring. Its designed to mushroom at lower velocities than typical copper/lead bullets so it will kill efficiently at longer ranges.
Sorry, but all copper in Mex-lfornia only. Not even shoot of any type can be used except for steel and other none lead shot. I don't hunt here in Mex-lfornia any long.
 
Last edited:
I just started using Barnes recently, not because I'm in California but because I found they were giving me good accuracy. I'm happy with them, but don't have any experience hunting with them.

That said, I don't trust CA politicians. They've moved the goal posts before, and I fully expect they will find another way to hinder or completely stop reloading in the future. Simultaneously, they will tax ammunition and reloading supplies out of existence.

Their interest is not honestly in protecting CA condors or others in the food chain, it is in making it impossible for residents to shoot anything at all, and eventually make it pointless to own firearms.

This same approach is being tried on a national basis, but the proponents of this effort are years behind CA.

If you want to shoot, and to reload, you will not find a welcome in CA.
 
I have had good success with the Nosler E-Tip. I shot an elk in AZ a couple of years ago with a 180 in my 300 RUM. 425 yards. I hit a little to far forward but it shattered the shoulder knuckle, went all the way through and shattered the off side shoulder knuckle. Obviously it didn't go anywhere. Also a bison with same. The 165 has also been good on deer. They both have been very accurate for me.
I have never used the hammers.
 
Badlands Precision has the new Bulldozer II line of hunting bullets out if you want lead core type b.c. and great terminal performance
 

Attachments

  • 20210115_140201.jpg
    20210115_140201.jpg
    1.1 MB · Views: 103
Warning! This thread is more than 4 years ago old.
It's likely that no further discussion is required, in which case we recommend starting a new thread. If however you feel your response is required you can still do so.
Top