Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
General Discussion
You think GAS is HIGH
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JimFromTN" data-source="post: 2562755" data-attributes="member: 113268"><p>What lies would those be? Can you be more specific? I am not familiar with the alternative facts of CRP. Are you saying CRP was not created back in 1985 and signed by Reagan? Is it a lie that the long-term goal of the program is to re-establish valuable land cover to help improve water quality, prevent soil erosion, and reduce loss of wildlife habitat? Is it a lie that there is debate by environmentalists over whether it is doing any good? Is it a lie that they are saying the problem is that after the 10 or 15 years is up and the farmer goes back to farming the land, everything that was gained is now lost? Is it a lie that participation in CRP is at a 30 year low and they are having a hard time enrolling any new land because of high commodity prices? Are you saying that the money you are talking about has nothing to do with CRP? If so, can you provide any links so I know what you are talking about. All I can find is they raised the amount they were giving out for CRP which is what I assumed you were talking about.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JimFromTN, post: 2562755, member: 113268"] What lies would those be? Can you be more specific? I am not familiar with the alternative facts of CRP. Are you saying CRP was not created back in 1985 and signed by Reagan? Is it a lie that the long-term goal of the program is to re-establish valuable land cover to help improve water quality, prevent soil erosion, and reduce loss of wildlife habitat? Is it a lie that there is debate by environmentalists over whether it is doing any good? Is it a lie that they are saying the problem is that after the 10 or 15 years is up and the farmer goes back to farming the land, everything that was gained is now lost? Is it a lie that participation in CRP is at a 30 year low and they are having a hard time enrolling any new land because of high commodity prices? Are you saying that the money you are talking about has nothing to do with CRP? If so, can you provide any links so I know what you are talking about. All I can find is they raised the amount they were giving out for CRP which is what I assumed you were talking about. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
General Discussion
You think GAS is HIGH
Top