Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Deer Hunting
WY. Proposed Changes to NR Fees & Quotas
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SummitsCalling" data-source="post: 1833339" data-attributes="member: 53117"><p>So NR actually pay the majority of F&G budget in Idaho, not the R as you claim. We, yes "We" as sportsman pay for ID, as well as other states wildlife through the Pittman–Robertson Act. Your argument about county roads is laughable.</p><p></p><p>Without NR buying licenses in ID the portion you will get will continue to dwindle, ID only received $13.2 million from the fund, down the previous two years. </p><p></p><p>Let's not even get into how much NR bring into ID year after year to the tune of $3.7 billion. It's more than just hunting that drives use of "your land". Think bigger picture here.</p><p></p><p>Please continue to blame NR for the crowding issues, despite NR recieving THE SAME NUMBER OF LICENSES year after year. Maybe it's the fact Idaho has grown 300k people over the past decade concentrating people into the same areas? </p><p></p><p>But the worst part of your small minded view points is wanting to take away opportunities from the next generation. I agree R should be treated better than NR when it comes to tag allocation, but without sportsman from all walks of life, hunting as we know and love will simply vanish.</p><p></p><p>I'm guessing you selectively either forgot those points or simple don't know them?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SummitsCalling, post: 1833339, member: 53117"] So NR actually pay the majority of F&G budget in Idaho, not the R as you claim. We, yes "We" as sportsman pay for ID, as well as other states wildlife through the Pittman–Robertson Act. Your argument about county roads is laughable. Without NR buying licenses in ID the portion you will get will continue to dwindle, ID only received $13.2 million from the fund, down the previous two years. Let's not even get into how much NR bring into ID year after year to the tune of $3.7 billion. It's more than just hunting that drives use of "your land". Think bigger picture here. Please continue to blame NR for the crowding issues, despite NR recieving THE SAME NUMBER OF LICENSES year after year. Maybe it's the fact Idaho has grown 300k people over the past decade concentrating people into the same areas? But the worst part of your small minded view points is wanting to take away opportunities from the next generation. I agree R should be treated better than NR when it comes to tag allocation, but without sportsman from all walks of life, hunting as we know and love will simply vanish. I'm guessing you selectively either forgot those points or simple don't know them? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Deer Hunting
WY. Proposed Changes to NR Fees & Quotas
Top