Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Wow! Anyone seen this? Remington Corelok
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ShootnMathews" data-source="post: 2797038" data-attributes="member: 59915"><p>Yeah. I've read a lot about that. I lean to Litz's way. Physics will tell you that it's not possible for bullets to shoot a 2" group at 100 yards and then those same bullets still land in a 2" group at 300 yards because they are skewing outward at such an angle that it's not possible for them to come back inward. And I'm not saying your rifle doesn't shoot that way. I believe you but I believe it's most likely a parallax or other scope issue. I know I've held several scopes that have yardage marks on the parallax/focus knob and the numbers do not match the parallax. Vortex in particular. I have a couple of the vipers and when you move them to focus the image at a known distance the numbers match the distance but they are not parallax free. To get the scope parallax minimized I have to adjust them where the image is blurry. <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="🤷🏼♂️" title="Man shrugging: medium-light skin tone :man_shrugging_tone2:" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f937-1f3fc-2642.png" data-shortname=":man_shrugging_tone2:" /> I've never really had a problem with most other brands though. I imagine those 2" at 100 yards bullets if caught on paper at 300 yards would be more like 6" and those 2" at 300 yards bullets if caught on paper at 100 would be more like 3/4".</p><p></p><p>Anyways. Yeah I threw those 3 brass away. I don't have bullets or powder to waste seeing if I can some how pull those brass into order when I have more brass that is in good order and shoots fine.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ShootnMathews, post: 2797038, member: 59915"] Yeah. I’ve read a lot about that. I lean to Litz’s way. Physics will tell you that it’s not possible for bullets to shoot a 2” group at 100 yards and then those same bullets still land in a 2” group at 300 yards because they are skewing outward at such an angle that it’s not possible for them to come back inward. And I’m not saying your rifle doesn’t shoot that way. I believe you but I believe it’s most likely a parallax or other scope issue. I know I’ve held several scopes that have yardage marks on the parallax/focus knob and the numbers do not match the parallax. Vortex in particular. I have a couple of the vipers and when you move them to focus the image at a known distance the numbers match the distance but they are not parallax free. To get the scope parallax minimized I have to adjust them where the image is blurry. 🤷🏼♂️ I’ve never really had a problem with most other brands though. I imagine those 2” at 100 yards bullets if caught on paper at 300 yards would be more like 6” and those 2” at 300 yards bullets if caught on paper at 100 would be more like 3/4”. Anyways. Yeah I threw those 3 brass away. I don’t have bullets or powder to waste seeing if I can some how pull those brass into order when I have more brass that is in good order and shoots fine. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Wow! Anyone seen this? Remington Corelok
Top