Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
General Discussion
Woooo Hoooo - Woofs
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Buffalobob" data-source="post: 136626" data-attributes="member: 8"><p>There are a few bumps in the road to delisting and hunting but hopefully US F&amp;WS will be willing to do it on a state by state basis so that the states like Idaho who try to develope a reasonably intelligent plan can go forward and the states who act stupid will not get authorized. The clock is ticking and if it is not done in the next two years it probabaly will not get done.</p><p>Everytime somebody illegally kills a wolf or poisons somebody's puppy dog it will provide on more piece of evidence to be used by the groups who will oppose delisting.</p><p></p><p>Anyway, it is my opinion that having one more game animal to hunt is a great step forward. It is like the reintroduction of elk in some of the easern states where limited hunting is now happening.</p><p></p><p>Most of the other changes were pretty good. I disagree with their position on muzzleloaders and keeping them as primitive as possible. I think in the longer term they will have to undergo a major change and accept the new technology because of sheer economics. It is no big deal to me as I only use a muzzlelaoder out of boredom and never kill anything with it anyway.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Buffalobob, post: 136626, member: 8"] There are a few bumps in the road to delisting and hunting but hopefully US F&WS will be willing to do it on a state by state basis so that the states like Idaho who try to develope a reasonably intelligent plan can go forward and the states who act stupid will not get authorized. The clock is ticking and if it is not done in the next two years it probabaly will not get done. Everytime somebody illegally kills a wolf or poisons somebody's puppy dog it will provide on more piece of evidence to be used by the groups who will oppose delisting. Anyway, it is my opinion that having one more game animal to hunt is a great step forward. It is like the reintroduction of elk in some of the easern states where limited hunting is now happening. Most of the other changes were pretty good. I disagree with their position on muzzleloaders and keeping them as primitive as possible. I think in the longer term they will have to undergo a major change and accept the new technology because of sheer economics. It is no big deal to me as I only use a muzzlelaoder out of boredom and never kill anything with it anyway. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
General Discussion
Woooo Hoooo - Woofs
Top