Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Why not H-414?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Trickymissfit" data-source="post: 879283" data-attributes="member: 25383"><p>The burn rates are very close, if not nearly the same. But looking in the Speer manual with 130 grain bullets in the .270 Win, I see they call out the same charge weight for max loads between the two of them. Yet there's about 80 fps difference between them with 760 being faster. In the 30-06 case length, I still like the three different 4350's (not interchangable by the way). Yet my experiments so far with Magpro clearly put it out front.</p><p>gary</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Trickymissfit, post: 879283, member: 25383"] The burn rates are very close, if not nearly the same. But looking in the Speer manual with 130 grain bullets in the .270 Win, I see they call out the same charge weight for max loads between the two of them. Yet there's about 80 fps difference between them with 760 being faster. In the 30-06 case length, I still like the three different 4350's (not interchangable by the way). Yet my experiments so far with Magpro clearly put it out front. gary [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Why not H-414?
Top