Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Why Not .270 WIn for LR?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="35 Whelen" data-source="post: 1508699" data-attributes="member: 105990"><p>Just because there are not as many bullets for the 270 is no reason not to use it. It's a fine caliber and works grate if you give it a change and find a load that works. If more people would use it we could demand more bullets and we would get them. People just will not use it out side of standard hunt conditions as must as they could. Remember when the 270 Win. came out in 1925 it was the long range cartridge of America.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="35 Whelen, post: 1508699, member: 105990"] Just because there are not as many bullets for the 270 is no reason not to use it. It's a fine caliber and works grate if you give it a change and find a load that works. If more people would use it we could demand more bullets and we would get them. People just will not use it out side of standard hunt conditions as must as they could. Remember when the 270 Win. came out in 1925 it was the long range cartridge of America. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Why Not .270 WIn for LR?
Top