Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
Politics Of Hunting & Guns (NOT General Politics)
Why are we sending ammo to Ukraine?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jbs2014" data-source="post: 2528875" data-attributes="member: 94052"><p>Wrong as always</p><p></p><p>I have seen Amnesty International's bias in the past.</p><p></p><p>Trump forced the NATO countries to honor their commitments regarding defense spending. Increased funding does not weaken military capability.</p><p></p><p>What is wrong with Trump extending an olive branch to Putin?</p><p></p><p>Would he have actually pulled us out of NATO? Or did he use that threat as a bargaining chip to get what he wanted from them?</p><p></p><p>Did TRUMP render or return a salute from a North Korean General? There is a difference.</p><p></p><p>You may want to read the DOD policy updates that occurred during Trump's administration. They are heavily focused on defeating peer/near peer threats, only two countries meet that qualification. Can you guess who they are?</p><p></p><p>Do you actually think that Putin was trying to take the entire Ukraine??? Even a layperson could look at the depth of arrayed Russian forces see that it was insufficient to occupy all of Ukraine. Do you even know what Putin's objectives are??? If so I'd like to hear them since he has not definitively stated them.</p><p></p><p>The Russian military does not suffer so much from a lack of "technical superiority" as much as it does bad logistics during offensive operations. They have many capable A2AD systems.</p><p></p><p>Regarding your last statement on Taiwan, I have no doubt that Brandon would let the CHICOMs seize Taiwan, with the complete support of his base.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jbs2014, post: 2528875, member: 94052"] Wrong as always I have seen Amnesty International’s bias in the past. Trump forced the NATO countries to honor their commitments regarding defense spending. Increased funding does not weaken military capability. What is wrong with Trump extending an olive branch to Putin? Would he have actually pulled us out of NATO? Or did he use that threat as a bargaining chip to get what he wanted from them? Did TRUMP render or return a salute from a North Korean General? There is a difference. You may want to read the DOD policy updates that occurred during Trump’s administration. They are heavily focused on defeating peer/near peer threats, only two countries meet that qualification. Can you guess who they are? Do you actually think that Putin was trying to take the entire Ukraine??? Even a layperson could look at the depth of arrayed Russian forces see that it was insufficient to occupy all of Ukraine. Do you even know what Putin’s objectives are??? If so I’d like to hear them since he has not definitively stated them. The Russian military does not suffer so much from a lack of “technical superiority” as much as it does bad logistics during offensive operations. They have many capable A2AD systems. Regarding your last statement on Taiwan, I have no doubt that Brandon would let the CHICOMs seize Taiwan, with the complete support of his base. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
Politics Of Hunting & Guns (NOT General Politics)
Why are we sending ammo to Ukraine?
Top