Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
Politics Of Hunting & Guns (NOT General Politics)
Why are we sending ammo to Ukraine?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JimFromTN" data-source="post: 2528722" data-attributes="member: 113268"><p>No one is upset. You can't say they are biased when they are reporting atrocities on both sides so it only goes to reason that if they are wrong about one side then they are wrong about both and therefore neither are committing atrocities and are not nearly as bad as people are saying.</p><p></p><p>2017-2020 was polar opposite of what Reagan did. Back in those days, republicans didn't like communists. Reagan would never have saluted a North Korean general. Reagan outspent them on our military, identified them as our enemy, and showed strength and supported nato. 2017-2020 was kiss the royal backside of Putin by praising him and taking his word over our own intelligence community, having undocumented meetings with him, and threatening to weaken and even pull out of nato. Its been said the only reason Putin did not invade was because he was expecting the US to pull out of nato completely when Trump won a 2nd term basically giving Putin carte blanche over Europe kind of like Siria. Trump would never have stopped Putin from invading the Ukraine. For one, Trump is too vindictive and would have let Putin have it because the Ukraine did not support him when he tried to get them to announce an investigation into Hunter Biden right before the election and the majority if not all of his base would support him.</p><p></p><p>If Putin isn't regretting this move, he should be. His military looks weak. He should have been able to take the Ukraine in a few days. It shows that the Russian military has not changed and is out of date and does not have technical superiority. Its the old, throw men at them until they run out of bullets and then overrun them mentality. The only reason he is a threat is because he has nukes.</p><p></p><p>I guess with Taiwan we do what Trump would do which would be to demonize the Taiwanese and let China roll over them with the complete support of his base.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JimFromTN, post: 2528722, member: 113268"] No one is upset. You can't say they are biased when they are reporting atrocities on both sides so it only goes to reason that if they are wrong about one side then they are wrong about both and therefore neither are committing atrocities and are not nearly as bad as people are saying. 2017-2020 was polar opposite of what Reagan did. Back in those days, republicans didn't like communists. Reagan would never have saluted a North Korean general. Reagan outspent them on our military, identified them as our enemy, and showed strength and supported nato. 2017-2020 was kiss the royal backside of Putin by praising him and taking his word over our own intelligence community, having undocumented meetings with him, and threatening to weaken and even pull out of nato. Its been said the only reason Putin did not invade was because he was expecting the US to pull out of nato completely when Trump won a 2nd term basically giving Putin carte blanche over Europe kind of like Siria. Trump would never have stopped Putin from invading the Ukraine. For one, Trump is too vindictive and would have let Putin have it because the Ukraine did not support him when he tried to get them to announce an investigation into Hunter Biden right before the election and the majority if not all of his base would support him. If Putin isn't regretting this move, he should be. His military looks weak. He should have been able to take the Ukraine in a few days. It shows that the Russian military has not changed and is out of date and does not have technical superiority. Its the old, throw men at them until they run out of bullets and then overrun them mentality. The only reason he is a threat is because he has nukes. I guess with Taiwan we do what Trump would do which would be to demonize the Taiwanese and let China roll over them with the complete support of his base. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
Politics Of Hunting & Guns (NOT General Politics)
Why are we sending ammo to Ukraine?
Top