Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
General Discussion
Which Muzzleloader is best for the money??
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="savagebrother" data-source="post: 94779" data-attributes="member: 5424"><p>ian m, you sound like someone who's on the defensive, making unsupported claims and talking with someone who obviouslly has money at stake. i have an original ml-I that has have alot thru it-but no b/p substitutes, only smokeless.</p><p>that was in early 2000 that gun still shoots sub moa with the loads it likes. as far as smokeless being the same as b/p substitutes. they dont even come close to the effeciency of smokeless. we are consistently shooting 250 grain bullets to 2400-2700 fps. my custom ruger no.1 in .45 cal is shooting the .40 cal. 200 grain sst at 2800 fps at 1 1/4" at 100 yards. yes i wanted centerfire capabilty because i live in a shotgun or muzzleloader only state. thats what i have with the savage. for the money why would you short yourself, i can still hunt with it in a no-smokeless state. dont buy into shortcomings but more versatilty.</p><p>sb <img src="http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y99/savagebrother/P1010001.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="savagebrother, post: 94779, member: 5424"] ian m, you sound like someone who's on the defensive, making unsupported claims and talking with someone who obviouslly has money at stake. i have an original ml-I that has have alot thru it-but no b/p substitutes, only smokeless. that was in early 2000 that gun still shoots sub moa with the loads it likes. as far as smokeless being the same as b/p substitutes. they dont even come close to the effeciency of smokeless. we are consistently shooting 250 grain bullets to 2400-2700 fps. my custom ruger no.1 in .45 cal is shooting the .40 cal. 200 grain sst at 2800 fps at 1 1/4" at 100 yards. yes i wanted centerfire capabilty because i live in a shotgun or muzzleloader only state. thats what i have with the savage. for the money why would you short yourself, i can still hunt with it in a no-smokeless state. dont buy into shortcomings but more versatilty. sb [img]http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y99/savagebrother/P1010001.jpg[/img] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
General Discussion
Which Muzzleloader is best for the money??
Top