Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
What’s up with Hornady’s reloading podcast?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="quandary" data-source="post: 3086039" data-attributes="member: 124624"><p>No that's not what they said.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p> People that haven't really listened to the podcasts yet comment clearly don't understand what the Hornady folks are saying. Nor do they understand the methodology and findings of their testing. Hornady did a statistically valid test with given calibers and reported those findings. The results of that test are inarguable, they are what they are. They also state clearly, many times, we are not telling you what you are doing is wrong. As a reloader you need taken in data and decide what you want to do and if you like your process and results, great. They are simply telling the listener that testing based on 3 or 5 shot samples is statistically invalid. Anyone who had statistics classes would understand this. They are simply offering an alternative approach based on valid sampling that will save time and components.</p><p></p><p>Another good podcast on this topic is Erik Cortina's podcast with the Hornady ballistician. They actually agree on far more than the differ. Also interesting is that the Unknown Munitions guys are fully onboard with the valid statistical sampling approach as well for both load development and zeroing.</p><p></p><p>One last thing I think the Hornady ammo is not all that great. I also don't have any Hornady reloading equipment other than the the OAL gauge. That doesn't invalidate what they found in a statistically valid test.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="quandary, post: 3086039, member: 124624"] No that's not what they said. People that haven't really listened to the podcasts yet comment clearly don't understand what the Hornady folks are saying. Nor do they understand the methodology and findings of their testing. Hornady did a statistically valid test with given calibers and reported those findings. The results of that test are inarguable, they are what they are. They also state clearly, many times, we are not telling you what you are doing is wrong. As a reloader you need taken in data and decide what you want to do and if you like your process and results, great. They are simply telling the listener that testing based on 3 or 5 shot samples is statistically invalid. Anyone who had statistics classes would understand this. They are simply offering an alternative approach based on valid sampling that will save time and components. Another good podcast on this topic is Erik Cortina's podcast with the Hornady ballistician. They actually agree on far more than the differ. Also interesting is that the Unknown Munitions guys are fully onboard with the valid statistical sampling approach as well for both load development and zeroing. One last thing I think the Hornady ammo is not all that great. I also don't have any Hornady reloading equipment other than the the OAL gauge. That doesn't invalidate what they found in a statistically valid test. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
What’s up with Hornady’s reloading podcast?
Top