Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
Politics Of Hunting & Guns (NOT General Politics)
Want to Bebate Video? Watch this!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Augustus" data-source="post: 775252" data-attributes="member: 10142"><p>Well Rand Pual got his answer. All the talking heads seem to be all giddy because Holder stated American citizens could not be targeted on American soil as long as they are not engaged in combat. This implies citizens can be targeted if they are engaged in combat.</p><p></p><p>So, now we need to know what is considered combat. Would the individual in California a few weeks ago be considered a combatant? The LAPD police chief stated there was no doubt Dorner was a domestic terrorist. That designation would certainly qualify him as a combatant and could be targeted.</p><p></p><p>If some time in the future the government ignores the constitution to a point that causes civil uprisings, it looks as though the groundwork has been lain to deal with insurrection with armed drone strikes. Considering the funding and authorization for the use of 30,000 drones has been approved, I would say any resistance would be a bloody endeavor.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Augustus, post: 775252, member: 10142"] Well Rand Pual got his answer. All the talking heads seem to be all giddy because Holder stated American citizens could not be targeted on American soil as long as they are not engaged in combat. This implies citizens can be targeted if they are engaged in combat. So, now we need to know what is considered combat. Would the individual in California a few weeks ago be considered a combatant? The LAPD police chief stated there was no doubt Dorner was a domestic terrorist. That designation would certainly qualify him as a combatant and could be targeted. If some time in the future the government ignores the constitution to a point that causes civil uprisings, it looks as though the groundwork has been lain to deal with insurrection with armed drone strikes. Considering the funding and authorization for the use of 30,000 drones has been approved, I would say any resistance would be a bloody endeavor. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Chatting and General Stuff
Politics Of Hunting & Guns (NOT General Politics)
Want to Bebate Video? Watch this!
Top