Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Verifying a load
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Shane Lindsey" data-source="post: 2884676" data-attributes="member: 25831"><p>Find your lands with the 200gr. Then back off .050" and see if it will fit in the mag and feed. I wouldn't be afraid to seat deeper if they won't fit. Barnes seem to favor more jump in the rifles I have tried them in. Ultimately they have given way to the Hammer bullets, as I like the terminal design better. Load work up it just the icing on the cake.</p><p></p><p>In my 300 WM I didn't load the 200gr but did the 175. I too was compressed with H1000.</p><p></p><p>Switched to Rl22, not compressed and gained 175 fps.</p><p></p><p>All loaded at 3.335" to feed from a Ruger box.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Shane Lindsey, post: 2884676, member: 25831"] Find your lands with the 200gr. Then back off .050" and see if it will fit in the mag and feed. I wouldn't be afraid to seat deeper if they won't fit. Barnes seem to favor more jump in the rifles I have tried them in. Ultimately they have given way to the Hammer bullets, as I like the terminal design better. Load work up it just the icing on the cake. In my 300 WM I didn’t load the 200gr but did the 175. I too was compressed with H1000. Switched to Rl22, not compressed and gained 175 fps. All loaded at 3.335” to feed from a Ruger box. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Verifying a load
Top