Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
uso or nf
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Vern Harrison" data-source="post: 17565" data-attributes="member: 1608"><p>At this point, I think USO just needs to be honest with everyone, to stay in the market.</p><p></p><p> I hear complaints from folks that know scopes and tactical weapons, that they have sent scopes back with problems, only to get the scope back "fixed" and a note saying no problem found.</p><p></p><p> I guess with that you can claim a clean record. </p><p></p><p> I truely believe, USO may be making a great scope. Does it need to cost $2500+, I don't know. I think you can take this pricing to far. Maybe they don't want to sell alot of scopes. Maybe they are satisfied with the number of scopes, they are turning out.</p><p></p><p> To target the folks at SP, SH, SC and longrange shooters. I think they need only to make a few models, make them afordable, dependable and admit when there is a problem.</p><p></p><p> I think IMO, the average longrange shooter, will pay upwards to $1,500 for a scope that will take him futher then whats on the mass produced market today. </p><p></p><p> I believe I read at SP, where at the last tactical match in Tx, 3 USO scope failed. There appears to be a real problem here, and someone in the company need to admit it and fix it. Then come out in the open and say straight up ...this is what happened and we have corrected it. Now if they start failing on weapons our soldiers are using and LE, price doesn't mean crap. </p><p></p><p> Honesty one way or the other will prevail. I would like to see John111 make this company work, I think he is trying real hard to do this. Right now everyone is waiting to see what he says next, concerning the failed scopes at the Tactical match. I hope for his sakes he tells it straight. If he does I think it will go over alot better for him and the company.</p><p></p><p>[ 12-21-2003: Message edited by: Vern Harrison ]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Vern Harrison, post: 17565, member: 1608"] At this point, I think USO just needs to be honest with everyone, to stay in the market. I hear complaints from folks that know scopes and tactical weapons, that they have sent scopes back with problems, only to get the scope back "fixed" and a note saying no problem found. I guess with that you can claim a clean record. I truely believe, USO may be making a great scope. Does it need to cost $2500+, I don't know. I think you can take this pricing to far. Maybe they don't want to sell alot of scopes. Maybe they are satisfied with the number of scopes, they are turning out. To target the folks at SP, SH, SC and longrange shooters. I think they need only to make a few models, make them afordable, dependable and admit when there is a problem. I think IMO, the average longrange shooter, will pay upwards to $1,500 for a scope that will take him futher then whats on the mass produced market today. I believe I read at SP, where at the last tactical match in Tx, 3 USO scope failed. There appears to be a real problem here, and someone in the company need to admit it and fix it. Then come out in the open and say straight up ...this is what happened and we have corrected it. Now if they start failing on weapons our soldiers are using and LE, price doesn't mean crap. Honesty one way or the other will prevail. I would like to see John111 make this company work, I think he is trying real hard to do this. Right now everyone is waiting to see what he says next, concerning the failed scopes at the Tactical match. I hope for his sakes he tells it straight. If he does I think it will go over alot better for him and the company. [ 12-21-2003: Message edited by: Vern Harrison ] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
uso or nf
Top