Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
US SWS (M-24)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bravo 4" data-source="post: 1745874" data-attributes="member: 8873"><p>Carried one for several years. They were (are, still in use by some forces, had some Airforce dudes on the range with us recently) decent rifles. They were not .35 moa guns. Read more into the mean radius, has to do with hit probably. Excludes things like fliers and goes off average. Don't get me wrong, I like the rifle and think we should use them for training at the schoolhouse if nothing else. Also, the 10000 round thing is kinda pushing it. I've seen them with close to that but they sure as heck didn't group better!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bravo 4, post: 1745874, member: 8873"] Carried one for several years. They were (are, still in use by some forces, had some Airforce dudes on the range with us recently) decent rifles. They were not .35 moa guns. Read more into the mean radius, has to do with hit probably. Excludes things like fliers and goes off average. Don’t get me wrong, I like the rifle and think we should use them for training at the schoolhouse if nothing else. Also, the 10000 round thing is kinda pushing it. I’ve seen them with close to that but they sure as heck didn’t group better! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
US SWS (M-24)
Top