Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Time for a .204 Ruger
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="backwoods83" data-source="post: 605981" data-attributes="member: 29890"><p>Vanguard would be my pick, I do not own a 204 but I load for 3 friends that do, and do all the testing and have yet to be impressed, a 22-250 will out run a 40grn in 204 with a 50grn bullet by over 100fps, I have also ran 40grn noslers up close to 4350 from a 22-250 and the 35s will easily break 4500, so imo a 204 is not efficient. One of my friends has the kimber you speak of and it shoots good, but its not good enough for the money, he wished he would have bought the savage 12 bvss 22-250 sitting next to it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="backwoods83, post: 605981, member: 29890"] Vanguard would be my pick, I do not own a 204 but I load for 3 friends that do, and do all the testing and have yet to be impressed, a 22-250 will out run a 40grn in 204 with a 50grn bullet by over 100fps, I have also ran 40grn noslers up close to 4350 from a 22-250 and the 35s will easily break 4500, so imo a 204 is not efficient. One of my friends has the kimber you speak of and it shoots good, but its not good enough for the money, he wished he would have bought the savage 12 bvss 22-250 sitting next to it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Hunting
Long Range Hunting & Shooting
Time for a .204 Ruger
Top