Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
The LRF Wars. Is it really that bad?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dean2" data-source="post: 1496180" data-attributes="member: 26077"><p>This is spot on advice. I have used Leupold, Bushnell, Vortex Swaro, Leica but no Sig. I own 3 Leica, two CRF, 1200 and 2000, and a Geovid 10x42 HD. Nothing is in their league for a hunting RF let alone the quality of the glass. I never carry Binos when walking, only the CRF in my shirt pocket, unless I am in the mountains glassing all day. I use the CRF as a monocular 95% of the time. For the little price difference definitely go Leica.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dean2, post: 1496180, member: 26077"] This is spot on advice. I have used Leupold, Bushnell, Vortex Swaro, Leica but no Sig. I own 3 Leica, two CRF, 1200 and 2000, and a Geovid 10x42 HD. Nothing is in their league for a hunting RF let alone the quality of the glass. I never carry Binos when walking, only the CRF in my shirt pocket, unless I am in the mountains glassing all day. I use the CRF as a monocular 95% of the time. For the little price difference definitely go Leica. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
The LRF Wars. Is it really that bad?
Top