Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
The Good The Bad and The Ugly About Yor 6.5 Sherman Short
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Michael O&#039;Connor" data-source="post: 1479128" data-attributes="member: 103722"><p>I truly agree with you on many things, but I thought your SST design was for battle rifles long distance in Afghanistan. Oh well, I know what the Soviets did to fight in that area in 1989. They said, it wasn't worth it. So Americans fought in Afghanistan for 16 years for one trillion dollars of tax payer money and are not provided with battle rifles that can compete with five decades old 7.62 x 54R Russian Sniper Rifles. I don't give a good God **** about hunting or competition rifles. I want a secondary battle rifle that will keep on sight with the new 300 Norma Magnum SOCOM or 338 Lapua Magnum Sniper Rifle. It has to be in a 1500 meter gun that keeps targets in sights, without much recoil. It is a tactical benefit of our latest technology in a sniper team. I need to talk to you Rich Sherman. I think you should work for the U.S. Government instead of hunters and competition shooters. You are too smart for people that can buy a new muzzle loader that can hunt and shoot past 30/30 distance and close to within one hundred yards of a 300 Savage. Don't worry about hunters, our troops need our ideas to bring them back home sometimes, Rich Sherman. </p><p>I think our Government and Military needs case designers like you , and Ballisticians like Brian Litz. I can go to the grocery store and buy meat and fish, but I can't protect our troops with an 800 yd. M-21 or M-25's from five decades ago. That is somewhat of what they are using in Afghanistan.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Michael O'Connor, post: 1479128, member: 103722"] I truly agree with you on many things, but I thought your SST design was for battle rifles long distance in Afghanistan. Oh well, I know what the Soviets did to fight in that area in 1989. They said, it wasn't worth it. So Americans fought in Afghanistan for 16 years for one trillion dollars of tax payer money and are not provided with battle rifles that can compete with five decades old 7.62 x 54R Russian Sniper Rifles. I don't give a good God **** about hunting or competition rifles. I want a secondary battle rifle that will keep on sight with the new 300 Norma Magnum SOCOM or 338 Lapua Magnum Sniper Rifle. It has to be in a 1500 meter gun that keeps targets in sights, without much recoil. It is a tactical benefit of our latest technology in a sniper team. I need to talk to you Rich Sherman. I think you should work for the U.S. Government instead of hunters and competition shooters. You are too smart for people that can buy a new muzzle loader that can hunt and shoot past 30/30 distance and close to within one hundred yards of a 300 Savage. Don't worry about hunters, our troops need our ideas to bring them back home sometimes, Rich Sherman. I think our Government and Military needs case designers like you , and Ballisticians like Brian Litz. I can go to the grocery store and buy meat and fish, but I can't protect our troops with an 800 yd. M-21 or M-25's from five decades ago. That is somewhat of what they are using in Afghanistan. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
The Good The Bad and The Ugly About Yor 6.5 Sherman Short
Top