Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Testing Hornady's new CX bullet
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="epoletna" data-source="post: 2519350" data-attributes="member: 87371"><p>I owned a Ruger No 1 in .22-250 for a number of years, but could never get it to shoot very well. Maybe my shooting, but since I was doing better with other rifles, I suspect the rifle.</p><p></p><p>And of course the No 1 has many critics because of poor accuracy, partly (I have read) because of the manner in which they attach the forend.</p><p></p><p>I wish the No. 1 shot better -- I think it is a lovely design and, of course, allows for a longer barrel with less overall length and weight due to its shorter action.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="epoletna, post: 2519350, member: 87371"] I owned a Ruger No 1 in .22-250 for a number of years, but could never get it to shoot very well. Maybe my shooting, but since I was doing better with other rifles, I suspect the rifle. And of course the No 1 has many critics because of poor accuracy, partly (I have read) because of the manner in which they attach the forend. I wish the No. 1 shot better -- I think it is a lovely design and, of course, allows for a longer barrel with less overall length and weight due to its shorter action. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Testing Hornady's new CX bullet
Top