Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Tested! 6.5mm 142gr Accubond Long Range vs the 142 gr Sierra Matchking.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Grizz25" data-source="post: 1221060" data-attributes="member: 83956"><p>I came across this. I'm pretty shocked. You posted a while ago on 11 accubond LR's and all came in between 88 and 99% as advertised BC's. with a average of 91%. Mean While this .264 142 gr came in around 70% of advertised BC? I didn't expect the 129gr & 142 gr to be so close. I'm not questioning you just shocked. I was hoping tests came in with this bullet at least around G1 of 610-.630 or better. But Thanks for the info.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Grizz25, post: 1221060, member: 83956"] I came across this. I'm pretty shocked. You posted a while ago on 11 accubond LR's and all came in between 88 and 99% as advertised BC's. with a average of 91%. Mean While this .264 142 gr came in around 70% of advertised BC? I didn't expect the 129gr & 142 gr to be so close. I'm not questioning you just shocked. I was hoping tests came in with this bullet at least around G1 of 610-.630 or better. But Thanks for the info. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Tested! 6.5mm 142gr Accubond Long Range vs the 142 gr Sierra Matchking.
Top