Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Tested! 6.5mm 142gr Accubond Long Range vs the 142 gr Sierra Matchking.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Konrad.INc" data-source="post: 1145975" data-attributes="member: 86301"><p>3% is significant and insignificant all at the same time. I'm happy that there is a hunting bullet that is only 3% different than a match bullet. However I was hoping for a much higher BC, simply because that is what was stated by nosler. I know the Sierra numbers are a little inflated but not nearly as much as Nosler.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Konrad.INc, post: 1145975, member: 86301"] 3% is significant and insignificant all at the same time. I'm happy that there is a hunting bullet that is only 3% different than a match bullet. However I was hoping for a much higher BC, simply because that is what was stated by nosler. I know the Sierra numbers are a little inflated but not nearly as much as Nosler. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Tested! 6.5mm 142gr Accubond Long Range vs the 142 gr Sierra Matchking.
Top