Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Temperature Sensitivity Test: IMR 8133 and Reloder 26
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="entoptics" data-source="post: 2078526" data-attributes="member: 104268"><p>Don't know enough about the physics, but I can't see how that would affect IMR8133 (cold = faster), in the opposite manner of RL26 and H1000 (cold = slower). The same equipment, materials, and protocols were used for all experiments.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It's only 4 shots, and both strings have mediocre SD/ES. Almost certainly coincidentally, the "hot" string has a fast "flier" and the "cold" string has a slow "flier". I wouldn't ever remove a flier from data, but it's plausible my results are skewed a bit to the "worst case" due to my poor sample size, and conservative interpretation of data.</p><p></p><p>Not saying my results are bogus, but I'm a firm believer that sample sizes should be appropriate to the conclusions I draw. I think it might be one of the reasons I've never owned one of those "Half MOA all day long, as long as I do my part!" rifles I hear so much about...<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="entoptics, post: 2078526, member: 104268"] Don't know enough about the physics, but I can't see how that would affect IMR8133 (cold = faster), in the opposite manner of RL26 and H1000 (cold = slower). The same equipment, materials, and protocols were used for all experiments. It's only 4 shots, and both strings have mediocre SD/ES. Almost certainly coincidentally, the "hot" string has a fast "flier" and the "cold" string has a slow "flier". I wouldn't ever remove a flier from data, but it's plausible my results are skewed a bit to the "worst case" due to my poor sample size, and conservative interpretation of data. Not saying my results are bogus, but I'm a firm believer that sample sizes should be appropriate to the conclusions I draw. I think it might be one of the reasons I've never owned one of those "Half MOA all day long, as long as I do my part!" rifles I hear so much about...;) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Reloading
Temperature Sensitivity Test: IMR 8133 and Reloder 26
Top