Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Target/ELR 375 HE..
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="fmajor" data-source="post: 1257798" data-attributes="member: 20646"><p>The matter, to me, seems all fine - so long as no additional revenue is being generated by someone other than Swamp (aside from an increase in brass hull sales).</p><p></p><p>It becomes poisoned fruit when someone takes the efforts of another (which was offered free of charge as a measure of goodwill) with the intent to cash in on those efforts. That just sucks in every way.</p><p></p><p>In the CheyTac example above whereby multiple CheyTac variants have been made, i don't see too much a problem as CheyTac is a for-profit enterprise and they have capitalized their costs.</p><p></p><p>However, i find it repugnant when one party capitalizes on another's efforts without even a consideration being offered.</p><p></p><p>A similar schite-storm occurred with the development of the 338 Lapua. So many hands were involved, yet proper identification/credit/consideration just didn't happen as well as it could have.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="fmajor, post: 1257798, member: 20646"] The matter, to me, seems all fine - so long as no additional revenue is being generated by someone other than Swamp (aside from an increase in brass hull sales). It becomes poisoned fruit when someone takes the efforts of another (which was offered free of charge as a measure of goodwill) with the intent to cash in on those efforts. That just sucks in every way. In the CheyTac example above whereby multiple CheyTac variants have been made, i don't see too much a problem as CheyTac is a for-profit enterprise and they have capitalized their costs. However, i find it repugnant when one party capitalizes on another's efforts without even a consideration being offered. A similar schite-storm occurred with the development of the 338 Lapua. So many hands were involved, yet proper identification/credit/consideration just didn't happen as well as it could have. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
Target/ELR 375 HE..
Top