Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
TARGET BULLETS ARE NOT HUNTING BULLETS!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Taj" data-source="post: 3052094" data-attributes="member: 98000"><p>memtb,</p><p>I just read that article and it states what a lot of us know and have believed for a while now. In a former life I was a cop and a firearms tech for a larger PD and have always been a fan Dr. Fackler and other like Gene Wolberg of San Diego PD. I was also a Vietnam era medic and have seen enough gunshot wounds to last me for a while. I am NOT a fan of Sanow and Marshall's studies but, like the article stated, they believed what they were preaching. I knew Evan Marshall fairly well and have had many a discussion with him over a glass of good bourbon. The problem was, at that time, there was no empirical data to support a detailed argument on either side other than the NIJ study based on temporary cavitation which was based on faulty data from the start. I've shot a lot of gelatin in the last 40 years and have reviewed a lot of shootings. A lot of research and design has gone into bullet construction and design in the last 25-30 years but we still don't have that magic bullet.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Taj, post: 3052094, member: 98000"] memtb, I just read that article and it states what a lot of us know and have believed for a while now. In a former life I was a cop and a firearms tech for a larger PD and have always been a fan Dr. Fackler and other like Gene Wolberg of San Diego PD. I was also a Vietnam era medic and have seen enough gunshot wounds to last me for a while. I am NOT a fan of Sanow and Marshall's studies but, like the article stated, they believed what they were preaching. I knew Evan Marshall fairly well and have had many a discussion with him over a glass of good bourbon. The problem was, at that time, there was no empirical data to support a detailed argument on either side other than the NIJ study based on temporary cavitation which was based on faulty data from the start. I've shot a lot of gelatin in the last 40 years and have reviewed a lot of shootings. A lot of research and design has gone into bullet construction and design in the last 25-30 years but we still don't have that magic bullet. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics
TARGET BULLETS ARE NOT HUNTING BULLETS!
Top