Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Tangent Theta vs ZCO vs Schmidt vs Kahles
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Quicksilver338" data-source="post: 3039222" data-attributes="member: 108268"><p>Lance is right in the money. After I got my March 4.5-28 high master I compared it to a buddies nx8, 7-35 atacr, 2.5-25 March, and a 3-15 TT hunter.</p><p></p><p>Comparisons were done on a partly cloudy day, mainly looking at a gearbox on top of an orchard wind machine at 900yds. Red gearbox with white lettering. Amazing how much detail you can see with these upper tier optics! </p><p></p><p>It almost seemed at the same magnification the March FX was better than the TT, given this is the lowest model they make and I have no doubt the higher end TT will be on par with being the king. Now this was a bit picky and sometimes when you bounce back and forth so much between scopes you tell yourself what you want to hear based on actual results <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="😂" title="Face with tears of joy :joy:" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f602.png" data-shortname=":joy:" /></p><p></p><p>Nx8 is impressive for the money, one of the best budget scopes out there as you get nxs reliability with better glass.</p><p></p><p>The March 2.5-25 is right on par optically with the nx8 but fit and finish, turret feel, etc is much better.</p><p></p><p>The 7-35 atacr was surprising and was just like the 3-15 TT and March 4.5-28. We felt they were all optically on par and was tough to decided specifically which one you'd rather have. It comes down to reticle choice largely at that point. Like mentioned the rotation of the ocular when adjusting magnification on the atacr is just stupid for an optic of that class. Fit and finish and turrets were nicer on the March and TT, while I assume the atacr will win a durability contest you'll have to really try to make any of them fail.</p><p></p><p>If I wanted the next level, and price of wasn't a concern I'd definitely be going with the TT 5-25 or their newer 7-35. I could get a ZCO or something, but at the end of the day I'd still be wondering about the TT so why not just buy the king and be done with it <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" alt="😂" title="Face with tears of joy :joy:" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f602.png" data-shortname=":joy:" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Quicksilver338, post: 3039222, member: 108268"] Lance is right in the money. After I got my March 4.5-28 high master I compared it to a buddies nx8, 7-35 atacr, 2.5-25 March, and a 3-15 TT hunter. Comparisons were done on a partly cloudy day, mainly looking at a gearbox on top of an orchard wind machine at 900yds. Red gearbox with white lettering. Amazing how much detail you can see with these upper tier optics! It almost seemed at the same magnification the March FX was better than the TT, given this is the lowest model they make and I have no doubt the higher end TT will be on par with being the king. Now this was a bit picky and sometimes when you bounce back and forth so much between scopes you tell yourself what you want to hear based on actual results 😂 Nx8 is impressive for the money, one of the best budget scopes out there as you get nxs reliability with better glass. The March 2.5-25 is right on par optically with the nx8 but fit and finish, turret feel, etc is much better. The 7-35 atacr was surprising and was just like the 3-15 TT and March 4.5-28. We felt they were all optically on par and was tough to decided specifically which one you'd rather have. It comes down to reticle choice largely at that point. Like mentioned the rotation of the ocular when adjusting magnification on the atacr is just stupid for an optic of that class. Fit and finish and turrets were nicer on the March and TT, while I assume the atacr will win a durability contest you'll have to really try to make any of them fail. If I wanted the next level, and price of wasn't a concern I'd definitely be going with the TT 5-25 or their newer 7-35. I could get a ZCO or something, but at the end of the day I'd still be wondering about the TT so why not just buy the king and be done with it 😂 [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Tangent Theta vs ZCO vs Schmidt vs Kahles
Top