Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Articles
Latest reviews
Author list
Classifieds
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Tangent Theta vs ZCO vs Schmidt vs Kahles
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="lancetkenyon" data-source="post: 3039196" data-attributes="member: 68875"><p>The Gen 3XR has a floating dot center. So does the 3XRF.</p><p></p><p>The only real difference is the 3XR has a .075M center dot, the 3XRF has a .050M center dot.</p><p>All subtensions and main reticle line thicknesses are the same .025M. Not sure why they make the 3XR look heavier in the drawings, but look at the dimensions. They are virtually the same except the center dot.</p><p></p><p>3XR</p><p>[ATTACH=full]545656[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>3XRF</p><p>[ATTACH=full]545657[/ATTACH]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="lancetkenyon, post: 3039196, member: 68875"] The Gen 3XR has a floating dot center. So does the 3XRF. The only real difference is the 3XR has a .075M center dot, the 3XRF has a .050M center dot. All subtensions and main reticle line thicknesses are the same .025M. Not sure why they make the 3XR look heavier in the drawings, but look at the dimensions. They are virtually the same except the center dot. 3XR [ATTACH type="full"]545656[/ATTACH] 3XRF [ATTACH type="full" width="863px"]545657[/ATTACH] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment
Long Range Scopes and Other Optics
Tangent Theta vs ZCO vs Schmidt vs Kahles
Top